XPost: milw.general, milw.politics, nyc.general   
   XPost: nc.general   
   From: ray.fish@abc.com   
      
   In article    
   David O'Hara  wrote:   
   >   
   >   
   > This man nailed it !   
   >   
   > --------------------------------------------------------------   
   ------------------   
   >   
   >   
   > How's this for a hot potato?   
   > Fred Reed (born 1945 in Crumpler, West Virginia ) is a writer and was   
   > formerly a technology columnist for The Washington Times.  A former   
   > Marine and Vietnam War veteran, Reed is a police writer and an   
   > occasional war correspondent.  He currently writes weekly columns for   
   > the website Fred on Everything.  His work is often satirical and   
   > opinionated.   
   >   
   > Black Power: A Done Deal   
   > By Fred Reed   
   >   
   > It is curious that blacks, the least educated thirteen percent of the   
   > population, the least productive, most criminal, and most dependent on   
   > governmental charity, should dominate national politics. Yet they do.   
   > Virtually everything revolves around what blacks want, demand, do, or   
   > can't do. Their power seems without limit.   
   >   
   > Courses of instruction in the schools, academic rigor, codes of dress,   
   > rules regarding unceasing obscenity, all must be set to suit them, as   
   > must be examinations for promotion in fire departments, the military,   
   > and police forces.  Blacks must be admitted to universities for which   
   > they are not remotely qualified , where departments of Black Studies   
   > must be established to please them.  Corporate work forces, federal   
   > departments, and elite high-schools must be judged not on whether they   
   > perform their functions but on whether they have the right number of   
   > blacks.   
   >   
   > Do laws requiring identification to vote threaten to end multiple or   
   > illegal voting?  The laws must go.  Do blacks not like Confederate   
   > flags?  Adieu, flags.  Does Huckleberry Finn go down the Mississippi   
   > with the Jim, or did Conrad write The Jim of the Narcissus?  These   
   > must be banned or expurgated to please blacks who haven't read them   
   > or, usually, heard of them.  Do we want to prevent people coming from   
   > regions infested with Ebola from entering the United States ?  We   
   > cannot.  It would offend blacks.   
   >   
   > We must never, ever say or do anything that might upset them - as   
   > virtually everything does.  It is positively astonishing.  One expects   
   > the rich and smart to have disproportionate power.  But America is   
   > dominated from the slums .  One might think that a single set of laws   
   > should and would apply to all citizens, and that things should be done   
   > without regard to race, creed, color, sex, or national origin, and   
   > that all should have the same rights and responsibilities.  It is,   
   > sadly, not so. The dominance of the media by blacks is impressive. If   
   > a white shoots a black to defend himself, it becomes national news for   
   > weeks, or months, and riots follow.   But when blacks engage in their   
   > unending racial attacks on whites, the media demurely look the other   
   > way.  The attackers are never black.  They are "teens." Reporters who   
   > say otherwise are likely to be fired.  In effect, the thirteen percent   
   > censor the national press.   
   > Much of their mastery has become so deeply engrained as no longer to   
   > be noticed.  There is the DC Hesitation .  In the bars and restaurants   
   > of Washington , a man weary of an incompetent affirmative-action hire   
   > in his office will, before commenting to a friend, lean forward, lower   
   > his voice, and look furtively over both shoulders to see whether   
   > anyone might overhear: The DC Hesitation.  People don't even know that   
   > they are doing this.   
   >   
   > Defensive behavior by whites has become nearly universal.  A sort of   
   > Masonic recognition-ritual occurs among white people recently   
   > introduced in social gatherings.  Is the other person, for want of   
   > better terms, a liberal or a realist?  Dare one speak?  One of them   
   > will say something mildly skeptical about, say, Jesse Jackson.  The   
   > other rolls his eyes in shared disgust.  The secret handshake.  Or, if   
   > the listener is politically correct, the bait is not taken.  In either   
   > case, blacks dominate political conversation.   
   >   
   > So extreme is the power to control speech and even thought, that   
   > politicians have to avoid mentioning watermelons, or that   
   > neighborhoods of high crime must delicately be called "sketchy"   
   > instead of "black," though all understand who lives there and what is   
   > meant.  The avoidance of racial reference is not an even-handed if   
   > despotic attempt to oppose racism since, as we all know, blacks freely   
   > apply any derogatory wording they choose to whites.  In short, they   
   > rule.  Which is amazing.   
   >   
   > The dominance extends to children.  When in junior high one of my   
   > daughters brought home a science handout with common chemical terms   
   > badly misspelled in a way which suggested a particular speech pattern.   
   > "Is your teacher black?" I said without thinking.  "Daaaaaaady!" she   
   > said in anguish, having made the connection but knowing that she   
   > shouldn't have.   Blacks control what you can say to your own children   
   > in your own home.   And of course if I had gone to the school and   
   > demanded that the teacher be fired, it would have been evidence of my   
   > depravity and probable KKK membership.   
   >   
   > The word "unbelievable" has lost all force.  Things that ought to be   
   > unbelievable, and once were, have become routine.  Still, there it   
   > was: Don't expect a junior-high teacher to have the level of literacy   
   > I had in the fourth grade.  Instead, make it dangerous to notice their   
   > stupidity.  This is not new, and it hasn't changed.   
   >   
   > In 1981, in a piece for Harper's, I wrote:  "The bald, statistically   
   > verifiable truth is that the teachers' colleges, probably on   
   > ideological grounds, have produced an incredible proportion of   
   > incompetent black teachers.  Evidence of this appears periodically,   
   > as, for example, in the results of a competency test given to   
   > applicants for teaching positions in Pinellas County , Florida , cited   
   > in Time, June 16, 1980.  To pass this grueling examination, an   
   > applicant had to be able to read at the tenth-grade level and do   
   > arithmetic at the eighth-grade level.  Though they all held B.A.'s, 25   
   > percent of the whites and 79 percent of the blacks failed.  Similar   
   > statistics exist for other places."   
   >   
   > Nothing has changed.  Blacks now control the presidency and thus, most   
   > importantly, the Attorney Generalship.  In this the staggering   
   > political power of blacks is most evident.  Obama was elected because   
   > he was black: an equally unqualified and negligible white politician   
   > would have had no chance.  He is now fiercely pushing the most   
   > profound transformation of America ever attempted, by opening the   
   > floodgates to immigration from the south.  To effect this end he   
   > apparently will simply ignore Congress and the Constitution.  The   
   > people will not be consulted.  Laws will be ignored.   
   >   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)