[continued from previous message]   
      
   disease? The answer is of course none, but the homosexual lobby   
   (6) brought about this reversal by its persistent and for the   
   most part dishonest public campaigning and lobbying of   
   government and influential organisations. Homosexuality is   
   indeed a disease, but a disease of the spirit.   
      
   The One In Ten Myth   
      
   The statistic that homosexual activists are most fond of   
   spouting is the mythical one in ten. Writing in the unofficial   
   Labour Party magazine Briefing, (7) in 1993, the well-known and   
   vocal homosexual activist Peter Tatchell reports that “10 per   
   cent of the population is exclusively or predominantly   
   queer...”, (his word); that “15 per cent are bisexual for all or   
   part of their lives”, while “25-35 per cent have at least one   
   homosexual experience leading to orgasm during their   
   lifetime...” (8)   
      
   These figures are derived from the so-called researches of Dr   
   Alfred Kinsey (1894-1956), an American sexologist who published   
   two widely publicised reports (9) on human sexuality in the late   
   40s/early 50s. It is Kinsey's report on the human male that is   
   the most widely cited. (10)   
      
   Kinsey's remarkable findings extend way beyond mere   
   homosexuality, and anyone who has read his work with the   
   slightest critical faculty will soon conclude they would   
   laughable if they were not so sick. For example, Kinsey and his   
   team report that of boys raised on farms, “about 17 per cent   
   experience orgasm as the product of animal contacts...after the   
   onset of adolescence” and that up to 28% of college level rural   
   males have some animal experience to the point of orgasm. Well   
   over half of these have some kind of sexual contact with   
   animals. (11)   
      
   One can only imagine what Kinsey understood by the word orgasm,   
   but leaving that aside it is clear that he is confusing the true   
   meanings of words and emotions. As the Conservative author   
   Stephen Green writes poetically of agony aunt Claire Rayner, she   
   uses the word love too loosely for us to know whether she means   
   friendship, affection, commitment, or ten minutes in a public   
   convenience. (12)   
      
   Two academics, Reisman (13) and Eichel, who subjected Kinsey's   
   researches to a close scrutiny, have thoroughly discredited his   
   findings. Even though “The Kinsey Reports have become the   
   starting point for subsequent sex research” and “The textbooks   
   quote Kinsey's findings as if they were undisputed truth”, (14)   
   Kinsey's research has never been replicated. (15)   
      
   Leaving aside academic studies, mere observation is enough to   
   indicate that far less than one in ten of the population is   
   homosexual, actively so or otherwise. The grain of truth in   
   Peter Tatchell's assertion that “25-35 per cent have at least   
   one homosexual experience leading to orgasm during their   
   lifetime...” may be that most of us have some sort of homosexual   
   experience at some time in our lives, but that depends of course   
   on how you define the term homosexual experience. If you are   
   propositioned by a homosexual, or if an openly homosexual man   
   smiles at you lustfully in the street, then you too have had a   
   homosexual experience.   
      
   The actual percentage of the population that is homosexual -   
   overtly or otherwise - is extremely difficult to determine. This   
   is made even more difficult by the fact that homosexuals are   
   concentrated in certain locations, (16) in certain professions,   
   (17) and that they make a lot of noise.   
      
   The purpose of the constant repetition of the mythical one in   
   ten is to attempt further to “normalise” homosexuality. This   
   argument is in any case spurious, as Sahib Bleher pointed out in   
   a reply to a query on the Party website: “the assumption [here   
   is] that the mere existence of a condition justifies its   
   validity, and that decisions are to be taken on the basis of how   
   much support there is rather than on the question whether   
   something is morally justified.”   
      
   Using the same fallacious logic, paedophilia, theft, even murder   
   can be justified. As stated above, not all minorities are   
   oppressed, and some deserve to be dealt with severely.   
      
   It is important to recognise that even many people who might   
   otherwise be considered “right wing” have fallen for much   
   homosexual propaganda. As well as referring to homosexuals as   
   gay, they often take the homosexual lobby's self-serving   
   statistics at face value. (18)   
      
   Catch Them Young   
      
   There is an old maxim - attributed to the Jesuits - that if you   
   school a child for the first six or seven years of its life, it   
   doesn't matter who has it for the rest. The age of consent in   
   Britain is now sixteen. Up until recently the age of consent for   
   homosexual acts was eighteen. The Labour Government, heavily   
   influenced by both the homosexuals in its own upper echelons   
   (19) and the homosexual lobby in general, was intent on lowering   
   the age of consent to sixteen on the grounds that not to do so   
   would be to perpetuate homophobia. It did so in spite of a   
   revolt in the Lords led by Baroness Young.   
      
   In February 1994 when a vote to lower the age of consent for   
   sodomy to sixteen was lost, hundreds of militant homosexuals   
   stormed Parliament and abused MPs. This was in spite of the   
   House voting to lower the age of consent to eighteen, which   
   under the circumstances was certainly a concession to   
   perversion. Peter Tatchell was quoted in the Times thus: “They   
   have no respect for us, so we will have no respect for   
   Parliament.” He also threatened a major campaign of civil   
   disobedience. (20) About ten arrests were reported. (21)   
      
   In November 1998, when the government tried again to lower the   
   age of consent for homosexual acts, the Lords prevailed. One   
   magazine reported that Tatchell wanted to push for it to be   
   lowered to fourteen. Other members of his group, OutRage, voted   
   to keep it at sixteen (for then) for fear of alienating the   
   public (and exposing their true agenda). (22)   
      
   Two years later, a letter published in the Daily Telegraph and   
   signed by nine doctors headed by Lady McEwen, C.A.B. Johnston   
   and Professor Gordon Stewart warned the government of the   
   Physical dangers of unnatural sex. Two of the signatories had   
   Islamic names, (23) and doubtless all Moslem doctors (along with   
   the great majority of all other religions and none) shared the   
   same sentiments. The signatories argued that by lowering the age   
   of consent for homosexual acts the government would be failing   
   in its duty to protect young boys. Unfortunately, the government   
   and the homosexual lobby prevailed, and the age of consent for   
   homosexual acts was indeed lowered.   
      
   Now, Tatchell in particular has come out of the closet. (24)   
   This year he has published a paper calling for the age of   
   consent to be lowered to fourteen for all sexual acts. (25) Two   
   examples of his sophistry from this paper will suffice:   
      
   “Two 14 year olds who have a mutually agreed relationship risk   
   maximum penalties ranging from 10 years to life imprisonment...”   
      
   By the same token, the maximum penalty for shoplifting is seven   
   years imprisonment. Who in modern Britain has ever been   
   sentenced to seven years for simple theft? (26)   
      
   One reason Tatchell advocates lowering the age of consent is to   
   cure the sexual illiteracy of the young. Sex advice by teachers   
   is said to be vague, euphemistic and even useless. “They never   
   dare promote the obvious: oral sex and mutual masturbation as   
   safer alternatives to intercourse”. This is a bit like promoting   
   grievous bodily harm as a safer alternative to murder, but the   
   duplicity of the Organised Homosexual Movement knows no bounds.   
      
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)