XPost: alt.global-warming, sac.politics, alt.survival   
   XPost: aus.politics   
   From: ww84wa@aim.com   
      
   On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 23:56:49 +1000, Fran wrote:   
      
   >On 23/06/2017 11:29 PM, Wally W. wrote:   
   >> On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 23:05:14 +1000, Fran wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> As your cite   
   >>> says, real climate scientists DO agree about anthropomorhic climate   
   >>> change   
   >>   
   >> Is this an Unum sock/disciple? >   
   >> How well schooled are AGW activists who don't know whether the first   
   >> letter in their "cause" stands for anthropomorhic or anthropogenic?   
   >   
   >Not being an AGW activist, then I can't defend adding the wrong ending.   
   >   
   >But since you only mentioned a hopeful 'gotcha' and didn't mention   
   >anything of substance, you clearly got the point.   
      
   ***The*** point? You think there was only one?   
      
   Some display faulty understanding of the cause for which they spew.   
   They want *others* to "take action," but they have no clue about what   
   those "actions" would do:   
      
   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yi3erdgVVTw   
   Penn And Teller Get Hippies To Sign Water Banning Petition   
   "... maybe they are not so much environmentalists as they are joiners   
   ... of anything."   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)