XPost: alt.global-warming, sac.politics, alt.survival   
   XPost: aus.politics   
   From: franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com   
      
   On 25/06/2017 12:50 AM, Wally W. wrote:   
   > On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 23:56:49 +1000, Fran wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 23/06/2017 11:29 PM, Wally W. wrote:   
   >>> On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 23:05:14 +1000, Fran wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> As your cite   
   >>>> says, real climate scientists DO agree about anthropomorhic climate   
   >>>> change   
   >>>   
   >>> Is this an Unum sock/disciple? >   
   >>> How well schooled are AGW activists who don't know whether the first   
   >>> letter in their "cause" stands for anthropomorhic or anthropogenic?   
   >>   
   >> Not being an AGW activist, then I can't defend adding the wrong ending.   
   >>   
   >> But since you only mentioned a hopeful 'gotcha' and didn't mention   
   >> anything of substance, you clearly got the point.   
   >   
   > ***The*** point? You think there was only one?   
      
   Since I had only made one relating to the nitpick you made, then yes it   
   was THE point that I made.   
   >   
   > Some display faulty understanding of the cause for which they spew.   
      
   Yes, you showed that with your nitpick because you clearly failed to   
   comprehend how many points had been made relating to your nitpick, but   
   you probably can't help being like that.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)