XPost: alt.global-warming, sac.politics, alt.survival   
   XPost: aus.politics   
   From: franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com   
      
   On 25/06/2017 4:48 PM, Wally W. wrote:   
   > On Sun, 25 Jun 2017 15:31:37 +1000, Fran wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 25/06/2017 10:44 AM, Wally W. wrote:   
   >>> On Sun, 25 Jun 2017 10:27:49 +1000, Fran wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 25/06/2017 12:50 AM, Wally W. wrote:   
   >>>>> On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 23:56:49 +1000, Fran wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 23/06/2017 11:29 PM, Wally W. wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 23:05:14 +1000, Fran wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> As your cite   
   >>>>>>>> says, real climate scientists DO agree about anthropomorhic climate   
   >>>>>>>> change   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Is this an Unum sock/disciple? >   
   >>>>>>> How well schooled are AGW activists who don't know whether the first   
   >>>>>>> letter in their "cause" stands for anthropomorhic or anthropogenic?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Not being an AGW activist, then I can't defend adding the wrong ending.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> But since you only mentioned a hopeful 'gotcha' and didn't mention   
   >>>>>> anything of substance, you clearly got the point.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> ***The*** point? You think there was only one?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Since I had only made one relating to the nitpick you made, then yes it   
   >>>> was THE point that I made.   
   >>>   
   >>> That was a clumsy attempt to spin your way out of that one.   
   >>   
   >> Certainly not as clumsy as the following attempt:   
   >>> "you clearly got the point"   
   >>   
   >> which is what I wrote about YOUR post, not any post of mine   
   >   
   > So you were saying I got the point of my own post?   
      
   Jesus wept!  I can't be bothered any longer with someone as dumb as you.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)