9e4df7ed   
   XPost: alt.california, vegas.general, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   XPost: misc.survivalism, talk.politics.guns   
   From: klausschadenfreude@null.net   
      
   On Sat, 03 Feb 2018 19:09:32 -0800, Siri Cruise    
   wrote:   
      
   >In article <0u9c7dpqasb6n5sqaf3itlb3pso4stoec2@4ax.com>,   
   > Klaus  Schadenfreude  wrote:   
   >   
   >> >So (a) Haig sold Paddock a few rounds of armor-piercing ammo,   
   >> >and lots of tracer ammo, and (b) Paddock didn't use either   
   >> >type of ammo in his attack?  This doesn't sound to me like   
   >> >much of a story.   
   >> >   
   >> >BTW, a bullet is only the projectile.  Ammunition or ammo   
   >> >is the complete cartridge consisting of the bullet, case,   
   >> >propellant and primer.  People including the article's   
   >> >author tend to confuse the two.   
   >>   
   >> I liked the "'incendiary capsule" on their noses'" part especially.   
   >   
   >If selling sabots were illegal, he could be convicted of selling sabots   
   whether   
   >you think sabots are dangerous or no, whether the sabots had been left home or   
   >no, whether the sabots had been incorporated in a round or no.   
      
   I saw no mention of any "sabots." I saw "incendiary capsules" which is   
   different than an "incendiary round" or "tracer round" or anything   
   else that exists today in rifle ammunition that I'm aware of.   
      
   Are you sure you're even replying to the post you wanted to reply to?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)