Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    az.politics    |    Arizona politics    |    3,152 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,714 of 3,152    |
|    catch and kill to All    |
|    How's that Supreme Court workin' out for    |
|    21 Dec 18 15:06:24    |
      From: januarybaybee@gmail.com              Thomson Reuters · Posted: Dec 21, 2018                     U.S. Supreme Court rejects Trump bid to enforce new asylum rules              Conservative Chief Justice John Roberts joined 4 liberal justices in denying       request              The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday dealt a setback to President Donald Trump by       refusing to allow his administration to implement new rules prohibiting asylum       for people who cross the U.S. border illegally, with conservative Chief       Justice John Roberts        joining the four liberal justices in denying the request.              The justices on a 5-4 vote rebuffed the Trump administration's request to put       on hold a California-based federal judge's order, at least temporarily       preventing it from carrying out the policy intended to make anyone crossing       the U.S.-Mexican border        outside of an official port of entry ineligible for asylum.              The planned asylum change was a key component of Trump's hardline policies       aimed at making it tougher for immigrants to enter and stay in the United       States.              Roberts, who last month rebuked Trump over his criticism of the judiciary,       joined liberal Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Elena Kagan and       Sonia Sotomayor against the administration. Trump's two high court       appointees, Brett Kavanaugh and        Neil Gorsuch, joined the two other conservative justices, Clarence Thomas and       Samuel Alito, in dissent.              "The Supreme Court's decision to leave the asylum ban blocked will save lives       and keep vulnerable families and children from persecution. We are pleased the       court refused to allow the administration to short-circuit the usual appellate       process," said Lee        Gelernt, a lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union, which challenged       Trump's policy.              San Francisco-based U.S. District Judge Jon Tigar blocked the policy on Nov.       19. The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals then refused the       administration's request to lift Tigar's order.              Supreme Court Chief Justice of the U.S. John Roberts joined the four liberal       justices in denying the request. (Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via AP)              Tigar's ruling prompted Trump to call the jurist an "Obama judge" and blast       the 9th Circuit in general as a "disgrace." Tigar was appointed to the bench       by Democratic former President Barack Obama.              Trump's comments led to an extraordinary response from the normally reticent       Roberts, who defended the independence of the federal judiciary and wrote in a       public response to Trump on Nov. 21, "We do not have Obama judges or Trump       judges, Bush judges or        Clinton judges."              The port-of-entry restrictions, due to expire after 90 days, were made through       a presidential proclamation Trump issued on Nov. 9 alongside a new       administration rule. The administration has sought ways to block thousands of       Central American men, women        and children travelling in caravans to escape violence and poverty in their       home countries from entering the U.S., with Trump calling the people in the       caravans a national security threat.              Illegal crossings at the southern border have dropped dramatically since the       late 1970s, but in recent years, applications for asylum have ballooned and       more Central American families and unaccompanied children are migrating to the       U.S.              Trump's proclamation stated that mass migration on the border had precipitated       a crisis, and he was acting to protect the U.S. national interest. Trump's       policy was crafted to alter American asylum laws that have given people       fleeing persecution and        violence in their homelands the ability to seek sanctuary in the U.S.              On Wednesday, a different judge blocked another of Trump's asylum-related       orders, this one aimed at restricting asylum claims by people citing gang or       domestic violence in their home countries.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca