Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    az.politics    |    Arizona politics    |    3,152 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,191 of 3,152    |
|    Guy to All    |
|    Pedophilia is Legal - Just Saying    |
|    28 Mar 21 15:18:46    |
      XPost: fl.politics, houston.politics, tx.politics       XPost: alt.abortion, talk.abortion       From: Guy@bigsky.com              Pedophilia is Legal - Just Saying              One can't rightly have sex with an unwillful prisoner, nor a mentally       incompetent       toddler. And then it's that one took somebody's kids skydiving, without their       knowledge, but it's really the kid's personal choice.              A child's right to sexuality is as sacrosanct as a child's right to Church. It       would more, at most be, that one couldn't hang out with them anymore, as far as       this warden-ward Parental tyranny is allowed to persist.              Pedophilia is less deviant than gay or beast. Pedophilia is akin to       interracial.       When you prohibit something you give someone a complex.              People who harm the weakest among us incite the most outrage. If you were       going       to take vengeance, you would start with those who torture puppies and children.       But it wouldn't undo the evil done. Yet at the same time, much of the       persecution       of pedophiles is reminiscent of the persecution of homosexuals, and even       interracial sexuality. There are still people to this day, who say that       homosexuals are psychopaths, and have a mental disorder. They make the same       claims about pedophiles. That some homosexuals are psychos in fact, that some       pedophiles have murdered children, that some adult heterosexual men, want to       have       sex with dead girls, is no acceptable stereotype of 90%-99%+ of the rest of the       population. Whatever percent that is. For the rest of the people who have no       such interest, and it is certainly far above 90%. Most people respect human       rights, yet not those who persecute pedophiles, homosexuals, and black men who       just 50 years ago, they hung from a tree for having sex with a white woman.              For the record we fully condemn child abuse. And in the strongest terms       possible.        In case anyone is wondering.              But there is nothing more criminal about having or distributing pictures and       videos of children having sex, than there is about having or distributing       nonsexual pictures and videos of children abused, which they distribute on the       nightly news and on Youtube both, as evidence of a crime.              Rather child porn laws are suppressing just such evidence of a crime. I have       heard from law enforcement, that in addition to happy consent child sex videos,       there are toddler rape videos. Toddlers screaming for their mothers, evidence       of       a crime hidden from the public eye. This is the greatest atrocity, an       abominable       offense to suppress activity that ought to see the light of day, as all       evidence       of crime ought not be shrouded in darkness.              You don't have to be pedo, or homo, or have sex with other races. You're just       not       against people who do; so long as no one is victimized. We're not guilty by       doctrine. But those persecuting others by doctrine, are guilty, by fact.       Actually       two wrongs don't make a right, any more than three do. But truth and error       exist       as scientific moral facts.              On the other hand, according to all just and right legal theory, you don't       have to       be interage prejudice either. It's like someone saying you can't have sex with       someone from Canada, and threatening to kill you if you do. Then you say       people       who have sex with Canadians have a mental disorder. It's not like every       interracial couple is a fetish couple. Prejudice is abhorrent.              But the right points of criticism against pedophiles, are: 1) You can't have       sex       with an unwillful prisoner, any more than a police officer can tell someone to       have sex with them, and do so, and 2) You can't have sex with a mentally       incompetent toddler.              And then it's that one took somebody's kids skydiving without their knowledge,       but       it's really the kid's personal choice.              ---------------------       So I was trying to figure out, if like the person said "yes" to the prison       guard,       would the prison guard still be in jeopardy if the person later said, they just       said "yes" cause they were afraid. Yet the law, "de jure," does not even admit       the possibility of consent, which is a fact, but says the act is criminal "per       se," which makes the law criminal.              Saying children can't consent *is* a lie.              I'm not a pedophile. I just don't like to see my innocent countrymen murdered.              People saying minors can't consent, are making the same mistake as people       saying       minors have to consent; and people saying minors have to consent, are making       the       same mistake, as people saying minors can't consent. Both persuasions are       abhorrent. Both parties need to be corrected. Because someone had sex in the       past, doesn't mean they wish to repeat it today. Minors are liable to be slut       shamed and pressured into blaming their partners, and slut shaming is wrong.        This       doesn't excuse actual tyrannical influence of a warden-ward relationship. And       obviously mentally incompetent toddlers cannot consent.              And then it's that one took somebody's kids skydiving without their knowledge,       but       it's really the kid's personal choice, and sacrosanct right, as it is the kid's       sacrosanct right to go to Church. Many teens meet the other kid's dad before       taking their sexual/romantic interests out on a date. But at the moment,       apparently the law wouldn't care if pedos had their young friend's parent's       blessings. Again, warden-ward tyranny aside. Kids in child porn deserve their       pay as much as movies stars and kids in underwear commercials.              No, I'm not making child porn. No, I'm not a pedo. In fact, I've never even       seen       it, and have just heard reports from law enforcement, about toddlers screaming       for       their mothers while being raped.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca