Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    az.politics    |    Arizona politics    |    3,152 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,230 of 3,152    |
|    buh buh biden to All    |
|    What if the Unorthodox Arizona Audit Dec    |
|    30 May 21 09:35:27    |
      [continued from previous message]              Kelly Johnson, who traveled from Orange County, California, to attend the       audit and carries a Smith & Wesson .357 Magnum in a holster as he walks       around between the Coliseum parking lot and the tent encampment to guard       against antifa, says that Joe Biden belongs in Guantánamo Bay.*              It’s been treated in the national press corps almost like distant history,       but it was only five months ago that a group of similarly minded Trump       supporters stormed the Capitol of the United States assaulting police       officers and hunting for public officials.              “What’s going on right here is dangerous,” said Kirk Vandermiller, a       counterprotester standing across from the audit supporters with his own       signs.              At about midday and in 99-degree heat, Vandermiller set up on the opposite       side of the street from the pro-audit tent with a two-sided replica road       construction sign, one side reading “ELECTION FRAUD IN PROGRESS” and the       other “SORE LOSER ZONE.”              After Vandermiller put out his signs, one of the women in the pro-audit       tent put out a new sign that looked freshly spray painted, which read       “Winner Zone.”              “They’re living in a fantasy,” Vandermiller said. “Adults live in reality,       children live in fantasy, and this is a movement of people with childlike       minds.”              As I began to head for the audit site, someone from the pro-audit side       shouted at Vandermiller: “What are you afraid of?”              This is a major talking point of the pro-audit side: If election officials       and Democrats had nothing to hide, they wouldn’t oppose the process.       What’s going on in the actual audit site, though, leaves plenty to worry       about.              First, the public has no idea who is paying for the audit. The Arizona       Senate put up $150,000 in funding, but the cost for the audit is reported       to run into the millions of dollars. The Cyber Ninjas are raising that       money from anonymous third parties.              What little we do know about the auditors themselves does not bode well       for an impartial count. The counters have been drawn mainly from the ranks       of the grassroots Republican Party, and the few who have been identified       publicly are self-described partisans. One of the workers who spoke with       CNN, Elouise Flagg, was straightforward about her perspective. “I think       Donald Trump won the election—firm believer,” Flagg told the network. “I       hope we come to a point where we’re happy with the results and truth is       told.”              Another auditor was a former Republican state legislator named Anthony       Kern who participated in “Stop the Steal” events, was photographed on the       steps of the Capitol during the Jan. 6 riot, and had been fired from a law       enforcement job for lying to a supervisor and placed on an official       misconduct list. Kern’s name was also on the ballot as an official elector       for Donald Trump—under normal Arizona audit procedures, it is illegal to       count a vote when your name is on the ballot. Kern was ultimately removed       as a counter because of “optics,” Senate liaison Ken Bennett told       reporters in the press pool when I was at the coliseum.              And then there are those hasty counting procedures, which seem almost       designed to create errors. Despite Smith’s insistence that this recount       was not a recount, the audit supporters and the rest of the Republican       base seem ready to view it as exactly that. Bennett, the former Arizona       secretary of state who is now the leader of the audit, said this count—and       he called it a “count”—is being conducted to look for “more than       acceptable variance” from the official tally.              “More than acceptable variance” is 0.3 percent, or Joe Biden’s margin of       victory in the state, Bennett told me. In Maricopa County, that would be a       change of 6,268 ballots, or approximately one error toward President       Donald Trump every third batch count. Again, the count allows up to two       discrepancies per batch between the two official counters and a third       “off” counter.              “This has been designed in a way to create this doubt and to be able to       put out misinformation and not be honest with the public about what they       found,” Arizona’s Democratic Secretary of State Katie Hobbs told me. “A       really key piece of any audit is that you can replicate your results, and       they’re creating results that are not going to be replicable by anyone       else who wanted to do the same thing again.”              Adrian Fontes agrees. “I can guarantee you right now they will not find       the same numbers because they’re not performing the same acts,” he says.       “Worse yet, spinning these Lazy Susans around and only giving these folks       three seconds per ballot and then discounting one of the three folks, and       those numbers, means that they’re going to get wildly different numbers       that are going to be wholly unverifiable.”              “We didn’t do so bad,” said deputy audit liaison John Brakey in the press       booth, on one of the final days before the audit suspended its operations       so that Veterans Memorial Coliseum could host a week of high school       graduations. “We didn’t qualify for Bizarro Watch, so that’s a win!”              Brakey was discussing his and Ken Bennett’s appearance on The Daily Show       the night before. “All Chinese ballots are on bamboo? Is it because soy       sauce would be too obviously racist?” Daily Show correspondent Jordan       Klepper asked Brakey and Bennett on national television.              “I consider it a victory because we survived it,” Brakey said.              The bamboo question had been trailing Brakey ever since he first reported       to a local member of the Arizona press that the audit was indeed looking       through high-resolution digital cameras for traces of bamboo in the       ballots. “They shot the messenger,” Brakey muttered at one point. “The       rest of my life they’re going to talk about this.”              Down below, cameras were snapping photos of ballot after ballot, still       looking for bamboo. But it was never Brakey’s idea, he wanted the press to       know. It was another member of the audit team, Jovan Pulitzer, who came up       with the notion that you could prove or disprove Chinese influence in the       election by hunting for bamboo traces on potentially smuggled ballots.       Brakey spoke at length about Pulitzer, describing him as a charlatan. He       also shared with reporters an email dossier that describes Pulitzer as a       “con artist who is a master of hoaxes and fraud” and a “failed treasure       hunter.”              Back in December, Pulitzer said that he could use forensics to try to       detect bamboo in suspected Chinese ballots; in March, he declared that “my       technology and intellectual property is assisting one of the most       impressive and qualified audit teams ever assembled.” Bennett subsequently       confirmed Pulitzer would be involved in the audit.              The bamboo hunt, though, had become such a national embarrassment that       Pulitzer himself tried to disown it during a conversation with me. “I       don’t lend any credence to that story,” Pulitzer said of the claim that       China had flown in tens of thousands of ballots to Maricopa County via a       South Korean airplane to swing the election for Biden. Pulitzer told me       that he’s a scientist merely trying to help “to tell whether that story is       true or made up bullshit.” Like Brakey, he says, “Don’t shoot the       messenger.”              As for the South Korean jetliner story, “if that’s found to be fraud, then       I’m all for taking a piece of bamboo and whipping the shit out of that       person for making up that bullshit story, because that is just un-       freaking-forgivable,” Pulitzer said. “But right now, nobody knows. And,              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca