home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   az.politics      Arizona politics      3,152 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 2,526 of 3,152   
   buh buh biden to All   
   Arizona Supreme Court reinstates massive   
   22 Apr 22 08:04:05   
   
   XPost: misc.taxes, talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   XPost: sac.politics   
   From: drooler@gmail.com   
      
   PHOENIX (AP) — The Arizona Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that the   
   state's voters do not have the right to reject a massive income tax cut   
   approved by the Republican-controlled Legislature and Gov. Doug Ducey last   
   year.   
      
   The decision means a tax cut is in effect that will hit nearly $2 billion   
   when it is fully in place and mainly benefits the wealthy.   
      
   The high court overturned a lower court judge who ruled in favor of   
   education advocates who collected enough signatures under the state's   
   referendum law to block them from taking effect until voters could weigh   
   in in November.   
      
   Lawyers for the Arizona Free Enterprise Club, a conservative pro-business   
   group that pushes for lower taxes and regulations, argued the state   
   constitution does not allow referrals for measures that provide for the   
   “support and maintenance” of state government and that the tax cut bill   
   falls into that category.   
      
   The Supreme Court agreed in a brief order issued just two days after it   
   heard arguments in the case. The order signed by Chief Justice Robert   
   Brutinel does not explain the court's reasoning, saying a full opinion   
   will be released later.   
      
   The lower court judge had said that the constitutional provision only   
   blocked referendums on bills that appropriate money, and since the tax cut   
   bill does not do that, it is subject to voter review.   
      
   Ducey, a Republican who pushed for an expansion of the court in 2016 that   
   has allowed him to appoint six of the seven justices, hailed the decision.   
      
   “This ruling is another big win for our state’s taxpayers and it couldn’t   
   have come at a better time,” he said in a statement. “With inflation   
   hitting Arizonans hard, this decision ultimately means more of their hard-   
   earned dollars can stay in their wallets.”   
      
   Most residents won't see much help, because the vast majority of the tax   
   cuts go to the wealthy.   
      
   The Legislature's budget analysts said the average Arizonan earning   
   between $75,000 and $100,000 will save $231 a year in state income taxes.   
   Meanwhile, the average taxpayer earning between $500,000 and $1 million a   
   year will save more than $12,000, according to the Legislature’s budget   
   analysts.   
      
   The coalition of progressive groups that backed the referendum slammed the   
   Supreme Court for “stripping the rights of everyday Arizonans, in an   
   attempt to protect the rich.”   
      
   "The ballot was Arizona’s last line of defense from the Ducey-packed   
   Supreme Court – today that defense has fallen," said the statement from   
   two groups backing Invest in Arizona. “Despite the explicit and strong   
   language of the Arizona Constitution granting the people a co-equal right   
   to legislate, they have been shut out."   
      
   The Arizona Center for Economic Progress and the Children's Action   
   Alliance said voters have repeatedly backed measures that boosted school   
   funding, child care and other progressive causes, only to have them   
   blocked by the high court or erased by the Legislature. Earlier this year,   
   a Supreme Court decision led to the demise of a tax on the wealthy   
   designed to fund schools that voters approved in 2020.   
      
   That came after lawmakers passed a law during last year's session that   
   would have cut the expected $900 million in funding by more than half.   
      
   Free Enterprise Club President Scot Mussi called the Supreme Court ruling   
   a “big win for taxpayers.”   
      
   "Invest in Arizona and out-of-state special interest groups need to accept   
   this reality and stop making a farce of the referendum process,” Mussi   
   said in a series of tweets.   
      
   Arizona's constitution lets voters block newly enacted laws by collecting   
   signatures from 5% of qualified voters. If they do, the law is put on hold   
   until the next general election.   
      
   Lawmakers at the Capitol were split along party lines, just as they were   
   last year when majority Republicans who hold bare majorities in the House   
   and Senate enacted the tax cuts with no Democratic support.   
      
   House Majority Leader Rep. Ben Toma said the decision provides clarity and   
   certainty, and means tax historic relief is not in effect. Sen. Rebecca   
   Rios, who leads minority Democrats in her chamber, said she was   
   “disappointed to say the least.”   
      
   “A true Democracy should have no problem allowing this to go before the   
   voters of Arizona,” Rios said in a statement. “Republicans continue to   
   attack our schools, teachers and students, despite a majority of Arizonans   
   making it clear time and time again that they want meaningful investments   
   in our public schools.”   
      
   Republicans were planning on getting around the referendum by repealing   
   the tax cuts and enacting larger ones, but that will no longer be   
   necessary.   
      
   Under the new law, rates for most taxpayers would drop to a flat 2.5%, and   
   revenue would be cut by $1.9 billion once the tax cuts are fully in place.   
   That’s down from a range of 2.59% to 4.5%. Arizona's state budget this   
   year. Arizona's current budget is $12.8 billion.   
      
   https://news.yahoo.com/arizona-supreme-court-reinstates-massive-   
   232455993.html   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca