Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    az.politics    |    Arizona politics    |    3,152 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,526 of 3,152    |
|    buh buh biden to All    |
|    Arizona Supreme Court reinstates massive    |
|    22 Apr 22 08:04:05    |
      XPost: misc.taxes, talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh       XPost: sac.politics       From: drooler@gmail.com              PHOENIX (AP) — The Arizona Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that the       state's voters do not have the right to reject a massive income tax cut       approved by the Republican-controlled Legislature and Gov. Doug Ducey last       year.              The decision means a tax cut is in effect that will hit nearly $2 billion       when it is fully in place and mainly benefits the wealthy.              The high court overturned a lower court judge who ruled in favor of       education advocates who collected enough signatures under the state's       referendum law to block them from taking effect until voters could weigh       in in November.              Lawyers for the Arizona Free Enterprise Club, a conservative pro-business       group that pushes for lower taxes and regulations, argued the state       constitution does not allow referrals for measures that provide for the       “support and maintenance” of state government and that the tax cut bill       falls into that category.              The Supreme Court agreed in a brief order issued just two days after it       heard arguments in the case. The order signed by Chief Justice Robert       Brutinel does not explain the court's reasoning, saying a full opinion       will be released later.              The lower court judge had said that the constitutional provision only       blocked referendums on bills that appropriate money, and since the tax cut       bill does not do that, it is subject to voter review.              Ducey, a Republican who pushed for an expansion of the court in 2016 that       has allowed him to appoint six of the seven justices, hailed the decision.              “This ruling is another big win for our state’s taxpayers and it couldn’t       have come at a better time,” he said in a statement. “With inflation       hitting Arizonans hard, this decision ultimately means more of their hard-       earned dollars can stay in their wallets.”              Most residents won't see much help, because the vast majority of the tax       cuts go to the wealthy.              The Legislature's budget analysts said the average Arizonan earning       between $75,000 and $100,000 will save $231 a year in state income taxes.       Meanwhile, the average taxpayer earning between $500,000 and $1 million a       year will save more than $12,000, according to the Legislature’s budget       analysts.              The coalition of progressive groups that backed the referendum slammed the       Supreme Court for “stripping the rights of everyday Arizonans, in an       attempt to protect the rich.”              "The ballot was Arizona’s last line of defense from the Ducey-packed       Supreme Court – today that defense has fallen," said the statement from       two groups backing Invest in Arizona. “Despite the explicit and strong       language of the Arizona Constitution granting the people a co-equal right       to legislate, they have been shut out."              The Arizona Center for Economic Progress and the Children's Action       Alliance said voters have repeatedly backed measures that boosted school       funding, child care and other progressive causes, only to have them       blocked by the high court or erased by the Legislature. Earlier this year,       a Supreme Court decision led to the demise of a tax on the wealthy       designed to fund schools that voters approved in 2020.              That came after lawmakers passed a law during last year's session that       would have cut the expected $900 million in funding by more than half.              Free Enterprise Club President Scot Mussi called the Supreme Court ruling       a “big win for taxpayers.”              "Invest in Arizona and out-of-state special interest groups need to accept       this reality and stop making a farce of the referendum process,” Mussi       said in a series of tweets.              Arizona's constitution lets voters block newly enacted laws by collecting       signatures from 5% of qualified voters. If they do, the law is put on hold       until the next general election.              Lawmakers at the Capitol were split along party lines, just as they were       last year when majority Republicans who hold bare majorities in the House       and Senate enacted the tax cuts with no Democratic support.              House Majority Leader Rep. Ben Toma said the decision provides clarity and       certainty, and means tax historic relief is not in effect. Sen. Rebecca       Rios, who leads minority Democrats in her chamber, said she was       “disappointed to say the least.”              “A true Democracy should have no problem allowing this to go before the       voters of Arizona,” Rios said in a statement. “Republicans continue to       attack our schools, teachers and students, despite a majority of Arizonans       making it clear time and time again that they want meaningful investments       in our public schools.”              Republicans were planning on getting around the referendum by repealing       the tax cuts and enacting larger ones, but that will no longer be       necessary.              Under the new law, rates for most taxpayers would drop to a flat 2.5%, and       revenue would be cut by $1.9 billion once the tax cuts are fully in place.       That’s down from a range of 2.59% to 4.5%. Arizona's state budget this       year. Arizona's current budget is $12.8 billion.              https://news.yahoo.com/arizona-supreme-court-reinstates-massive-       232455993.html              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca