Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    az.politics    |    Arizona politics    |    3,152 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,617 of 3,152    |
|    zinn to All    |
|    Arizona Judge Reinstates Strict Abortion    |
|    27 Sep 22 08:05:56    |
      XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.abortion, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh       XPost: sac.politics       From: zinn@reno.us              A 15-week abortion ban passed this year will take effect on Saturday. But       the attorney general has argued that the near-total ban from the 19th       century should take precedence.              A judge on Friday ruled that a near-total abortion ban written before       Arizona became a state must be enforced, throwing abortion access into       question one day before the start of a 15-week ban that passed the       Legislature this year.              The stricter ban, which can be traced to 1864, was blocked by a court       injunction in 1973 shortly after the Supreme Court, in Roe v. Wade,       determined that there was a constitutional right to abortion.              On Friday, Judge Kellie Johnson of Pima County Superior Court lifted that       injunction, noting that Roe had been overruled in June and that Planned       Parenthood’s request for the court to “harmonize the laws” in Arizona was       flawed.              “The court finds that because the legal basis for the judgment entered in       1973 has now been overruled, it must vacate the judgment in its entirety,”       she wrote. “The court finds an attempt to reconcile 50 years of       legislative activity procedurally improper.”              Planned Parenthood Arizona had argued that the conflicting laws should be       harmonized so licensed physicians could continue providing abortions under       the new regulation, with the much earlier law applying to others       performing the procedure.              Even though abortion remained legal in Arizona after the Supreme Court’s       decision this year, it has been all but unavailable, as doctors and       abortion clinics have tried to sort out confusion about which law would       ultimately take effect. Even politicians disagreed on the relationship       between the laws, which each provide exceptions only in the case of a       medical emergency.              Gov. Doug Ducey has said that the 15-week ban he signed in March would       supersede the century-old ban, but Attorney General Mark Brnovich, a       fellow Republican, has argued that the older ban should take precedence.       Mr. Brnovich filed the motion to vacate the decades-old injunction.              “We applaud the court for upholding the will of the Legislature and       providing clarity and uniformity on this important issue,” Mr. Brnovich       said in a statement after the ruling. “I have and will continue to protect       the most vulnerable Arizonans.”              Abortion rights supporters were critical of the judge’s decision.              “Today’s ruling by the Pima County Superior Court has the practical and       deplorable result of sending Arizonans back nearly 150 years,” Brittany       Fonteno, the president and chief executive of Planned Parenthood Arizona,       said in a statement. “No archaic law should dictate our reproductive       freedom and how we live our lives today.”              The 1864 law, codified by the state’s territorial legislature, mandates a       two- to five-year prison sentence for anyone who helps a woman obtain an       abortion.              https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/23/us/arizona-abortion-ban.html              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca