[continued from previous message]   
      
   >>>>>>> I consider it none of my business and something that should   
   >>>>>>> be strictly between her and her doctor.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>You approve of killing babies.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Not at all.  I support the right of a woman to choose   
   >>>>>whether or not to have a baby.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Which means.....drumroll please...   
   >>>>   
   >>>>You approve of killing babies when the woman doesn't want it.  At   
   >>>>least admit what you stand for.   
   >>>   
   >>>All babies have been born alive.   
   >>   
   >>So when an abortion results in a child that is showing signs of life,   
   >>you would demand they treat it, right?   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>>I stand for exactly what I said.   
   >>   
   >>Yes you do.  You have "stood by" your definition of calling a baby   
   >>whatever you want it to mean.   
   >   
   >That almost never happens, but if it is born alive it is a   
   >person with the rights and legal protection of any person.   
   >   
      
   I suspect it happens far more frequently than you know.   
      
   >You seem to think it is a frequent occurrence.   
      
   Your response to my question was rather weak.  In these cases, is it   
   mandatory to save the life of the child if possible?  It's a simple   
   question.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)