home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   az.politics      Arizona politics      3,152 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 2,905 of 3,152   
   Attila to cmnocj53tc8v0a3bnt8nd3u37bvc770sn3@   
   Re: Foetuses can be called 'unborn human   
   26 Aug 24 08:00:01   
   
   [continued from previous message]   
      
   >>>>>>>> I consider it none of my business and something that should   
   >>>>>>>> be strictly between her and her doctor.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>You approve of killing babies.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>Not at all.  I support the right of a woman to choose   
   >>>>>>whether or not to have a baby.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Which means.....drumroll please...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>You approve of killing babies when the woman doesn't want it.  At   
   >>>>>least admit what you stand for.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>All babies have been born alive.   
   >>>   
   >>>So when an abortion results in a child that is showing signs of life,   
   >>>you would demand they treat it, right?   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>I stand for exactly what I said.   
   >>>   
   >>>Yes you do.  You have "stood by" your definition of calling a baby   
   >>>whatever you want it to mean.   
   >>   
   >>That almost never happens, but if it is born alive it is a   
   >>person with the rights and legal protection of any person.   
   >>   
   >   
   >I suspect it happens far more frequently than you know.   
      
   What you suspect is irrelevant.  The facts show most   
   abortions occur very early and very few occur during late   
   term and most of these are based upon medical necessary.   
      
   The earlier the procedure the less impact it has on the   
   woman so only an idiot who could find an equal idiot doctor   
   would have a late term abortion by choice.  It would be   
   easier on her to just give birth unless there was a medical   
   reason involved.   
      
      
   >   
   >>You seem to think it is a frequent occurrence.   
   >   
   >Your response to my question was rather weak.  In these cases, is it   
   >mandatory to save the life of the child if possible?  It's a simple   
   >question.   
      
   The delineation is very clear.  After live birth there is an   
   individual with rights.  Before live birth there is no such   
   individual.  No "child" yet exists.   
      
   For medical reasons at some point it would be much safer and   
   easier for the woman to complete the pregnancy than to abort   
   it.  All of the gruesomely described late term abortions are   
   almost always presented and pure anti-abortion propaganda   
   with nothing to show they are not simply made up.   
      
   I am sure there are doctors who are willing to do just about   
   anything if the price is right but that is more of a medical   
   legal and ethics situation than a pro-choice situation.   
      
   --   
      
   Build a Wall.   
   Deport them all.   
      
   Go WOKE.  Go Broke.   
      
   Stop DEI (Dumbass Egotistical Idiocy),   
   the Green Raw Deal, Income redistribution,   
   and Social anything.   
      
   Let them DIE.   
      
   Did the last sane person leaving California   
   remember to turn out the lights?  The Rotten   
   Apple?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca