Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    az.politics    |    Arizona politics    |    3,152 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,905 of 3,152    |
|    Attila to cmnocj53tc8v0a3bnt8nd3u37bvc770sn3@    |
|    Re: Foetuses can be called 'unborn human    |
|    26 Aug 24 08:00:01    |
      [continued from previous message]              >>>>>>>> I consider it none of my business and something that should       >>>>>>>> be strictly between her and her doctor.       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>>You approve of killing babies.       >>>>>>       >>>>>>Not at all. I support the right of a woman to choose       >>>>>>whether or not to have a baby.       >>>>>       >>>>>Which means.....drumroll please...       >>>>>       >>>>>You approve of killing babies when the woman doesn't want it. At       >>>>>least admit what you stand for.       >>>>       >>>>All babies have been born alive.       >>>       >>>So when an abortion results in a child that is showing signs of life,       >>>you would demand they treat it, right?       >>>       >>>       >>>>       >>>>I stand for exactly what I said.       >>>       >>>Yes you do. You have "stood by" your definition of calling a baby       >>>whatever you want it to mean.       >>       >>That almost never happens, but if it is born alive it is a       >>person with the rights and legal protection of any person.       >>       >       >I suspect it happens far more frequently than you know.              What you suspect is irrelevant. The facts show most       abortions occur very early and very few occur during late       term and most of these are based upon medical necessary.              The earlier the procedure the less impact it has on the       woman so only an idiot who could find an equal idiot doctor       would have a late term abortion by choice. It would be       easier on her to just give birth unless there was a medical       reason involved.                     >       >>You seem to think it is a frequent occurrence.       >       >Your response to my question was rather weak. In these cases, is it       >mandatory to save the life of the child if possible? It's a simple       >question.              The delineation is very clear. After live birth there is an       individual with rights. Before live birth there is no such       individual. No "child" yet exists.              For medical reasons at some point it would be much safer and       easier for the woman to complete the pregnancy than to abort       it. All of the gruesomely described late term abortions are       almost always presented and pure anti-abortion propaganda       with nothing to show they are not simply made up.              I am sure there are doctors who are willing to do just about       anything if the price is right but that is more of a medical       legal and ethics situation than a pro-choice situation.              --              Build a Wall.       Deport them all.              Go WOKE. Go Broke.              Stop DEI (Dumbass Egotistical Idiocy),       the Green Raw Deal, Income redistribution,       and Social anything.              Let them DIE.              Did the last sane person leaving California       remember to turn out the lights? The Rotten       Apple?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca