home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   az.politics      Arizona politics      3,152 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 2,912 of 3,152   
   Attila to ksbrcjhccq3eh40fb2bjr6mcsmukskk9st@   
   Re: Foetuses can be called 'unborn human   
   27 Aug 24 15:46:29   
   
   [continued from previous message]   
      
   >>>>>>>>>> >>woman and her doctor only.   
   >>>>>>>>>> >   
   >>>>>>>>>> >You've done nothing but attempt to water down the term baby which   
   is   
   >>>>>>>>>> >typical of those who favor killing them in the womb.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> I support the right of a woman to decide whether to complete   
   >>>>>>>>>> her pregnancy or terminate it.  How and why she would make   
   >>>>>>>>>> her decision does not concern me nor do I care what that   
   >>>>>>>>>> decision is as long as she freely has the choice of either   
   >>>>>>>>>> option.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> I consider it none of my business and something that should   
   >>>>>>>>>> be strictly between her and her doctor.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>You approve of killing babies.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>Not at all.  I support the right of a woman to choose   
   >>>>>>>>whether or not to have a baby.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>Which means.....drumroll please...   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>You approve of killing babies when the woman doesn't want it.  At   
   >>>>>>>least admit what you stand for.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>All babies have been born alive.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>So when an abortion results in a child that is showing signs of life,   
   >>>>>you would demand they treat it, right?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>I stand for exactly what I said.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Yes you do.  You have "stood by" your definition of calling a baby   
   >>>>>whatever you want it to mean.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>That almost never happens, but if it is born alive it is a   
   >>>>person with the rights and legal protection of any person.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>>I suspect it happens far more frequently than you know.   
   >>   
   >>What you suspect is irrelevant.  The facts show most   
   >>abortions occur very early and very few occur during late   
   >>term and most of these are based upon medical necessary.   
   >   
   >Goal post moving noted.   
      
   Nonsense, as we both know.  Your "suspect" is still   
   irrelevant.  It is hardly fact.   
      
   >   
   >>   
   >>The earlier the procedure the less impact it has on the   
   >>woman so only an idiot who could find an equal idiot doctor   
   >>would have a late term abortion by choice.  It would be   
   >>easier on her to just give birth unless there was a medical   
   >>reason involved.   
   >>   
   >   
   >Kill em early eh?   
      
   Terminate the process early to reduce the physical impact on   
   the woman involved.   
      
   >   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>>>You seem to think it is a frequent occurrence.   
   >>>   
   >>>Your response to my question was rather weak.  In these cases, is it   
   >>>mandatory to save the life of the child if possible?  It's a simple   
   >>>question.   
   >>   
   >>The delineation is very clear.  After live birth there is an   
   >>individual with rights.  Before live birth there is no such   
   >>individual.  No "child" yet exists.   
   >>   
   >   
   >What's your delineation?  Are you one of those who try to tell us that   
   >until the baby is fully out of the womb and cord snipped and   
   >breathing, it's not a baby?   
      
   Exactly.  That was the historical definition.   
      
   >   
   >>For medical reasons at some point it would be much safer and   
   >>easier for the woman to complete the pregnancy than to abort   
   >>it.  All of the gruesomely described late term abortions are   
   >>almost always presented and pure anti-abortion propaganda   
   >>with nothing to show they are not simply made up.   
   >>   
   >>I am sure there are doctors who are willing to do just about   
   >>anything if the price is right but that is more of a medical   
   >>legal and ethics situation than a pro-choice situation.   
   >   
   >You manage to not answer the question put to you.  Typical of those   
   >who think killing babies is ok as long as the mother doesn't want it.   
      
   All babies have been born alive.   
      
   --   
      
   Build a Wall.   
   Deport them all.   
      
   Go WOKE.  Go Broke.   
      
   Stop DEI (Dumbass Egotistical Idiocy),   
   the Green Raw Deal, Income redistribution,   
   and Social anything.   
      
   Let them DIE.   
      
   Did the last sane person leaving California   
   remember to turn out the lights?  The Rotten   
   Apple?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca