XPost: alt.abortion, talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   XPost: sac.politics   
   From: me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net   
      
   "Chris Engstrom" wrote in message   
   news:FaHzO.87673$FUV7.55798@fx15.iad...   
   > On 8/28/2024 4:15 AM, NoBody wrote:   
   >> On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 17:05:06 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth   
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 8/27/2024 2:11 PM, Just Wondering wrote:   
   >>>> On 8/27/2024 2:03 PM, Attila wrote:   
   >>>>> On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 12:35:03 -0600, Just Wondering   
   >>>>> in alt.abortion with message-id   
   >>>>> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>> {snip}   
   >>>   
   >>>>>>>> The fact that any of them even exists shows that fetuses   
   >>>>>>>> are unborn humans.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> No one questions the species involved - simple DNA proves   
   >>>>>>> that. The issue is at what point an individual human being   
   >>>>>>> comes into existence. Historically it has never been prior   
   >>>>>>> to live birth.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Historically you are wrong.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> The laws involving a fetus and a born child prove you wrong.   
   >>>>> After birth a child can inherit, be a tax deduction, be   
   >>>>> counted in a census, own property, be a citizen under the   
   >>>>> proper laws, and need a passport, again under certain laws   
   >>>>> in certain locations among other things. None of this can   
   >>>>> apply to a fetus.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>> There's your problem. You write of statutes. I speak of   
   >>>> biological reality.   
   >>>   
   >>> There is no "biological reality" about whether a fetus is a person. And   
   >>> personhood, not "human life" or "unborn human" is the debate.   
   >>   
   >> Actually you avoided the use of the term "baby" which is the term   
   >> we've been discussing from the beginning. Why is that?   
   >   
   > Because neither a developing fetus nor an embryo is a "baby." And neither   
   > one is a person.   
      
   So then if you punch a pregnant woman in the belly and cause a miscarriage   
   then it's just simple assault and wasn't really murder?   
      
   If you're going to come up with a standard, then we should see some   
   consistency in the law as to it's application.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|