XPost: alt.abortion, talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   XPost: sac.politics   
   From: noway@nowhere.com   
      
   On 9/8/2024 1:54 PM, Attila wrote:   
   > On Sun, 8 Sep 2024 08:20:35 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth   
   >  in alt.abortion with message-id   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 9/8/2024 8:13 AM, Attila wrote:   
   >>> On Sun, 8 Sep 2024 07:57:08 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth   
   >>>  in alt.abortion with message-id   
   >>>  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 9/8/2024 4:25 AM, Attila wrote:   
   >>>>> On Sun, 8 Sep 2024 00:27:33 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth   
   >>>>>  in alt.abortion with message-id   
   >>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 9/7/2024 11:49 PM, Attila wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Right! Like it or not, Roe is gone. And therefore, legislatures can   
   ban   
   >>>>>>>> abortion even though a fetus is not a person.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> True.  But that can be reversed with the proper legal steps.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> You are expecting SCOTUS to reverse course and reinstate Roe? Sorry, no.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Of course not, but there could be legislation and/or   
   >>>>> Amendments or other court cases that effectively do the same   
   >>>>> thing.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> There can't be other court cases that apply the federal constitution.   
   >>>> SCOTUS has spoken and all other courts are bound by their decision.   
   >>>   
   >>> Sigh.  Another SCOTUS case of course.   
   >>   
   >> WTF? You just said "of course not" to whether SCOTUS will reinstate Roe,   
   >> and argued that *other* court cases can do the same job. What *other*   
   >> SCOTUS court cases are you talking about?   
   >>   
   >>>> Yes, there can be legislation by Congress that forbids the states from   
   >>>> banning abortion (even though you said Congress can't do that).   
   >>>   
   >>> I am not an attorney.  I will not argue specific laws   
   >>> because I am not qualified to do so, and neither your   
   >>> opinion or mine will impact legal procedures.   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> And of course there are several drugs available.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I'm not sure what happens to you, but is illegal in Alabama to mail,   
   >>>> receive or use these drugs for abortions.   
   >>>   
   >>> I doubt that will survive a court challenge.   
   >>   
   >> Roe is wrong. SCOTUS said Alabama can ban abortion.   
   >>   
   >> At this point I am torn between whether you are an idiot or a troll.   
   >   
   > Neither,  I simply support anything that would reestablish   
   > the right of a  woman to decide whether or not to terminate   
   > her pregnancy.  Not being an attorney I don't know what   
   > legal path would be necessary.   
      
   If you had said "I don't know" all along rather than "I doubt that will   
   survive a court challenge," then you would not be an idiot or a troll.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)