XPost: alt.abortion, talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
XPost: sac.politics
From: NoBody@nowhere.com
On Sun, 08 Sep 2024 11:13:51 -0400, Attila wrote:
>On Sun, 8 Sep 2024 07:57:08 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
> in alt.abortion with message-id
> wrote:
>
>>On 9/8/2024 4:25 AM, Attila wrote:
>>> On Sun, 8 Sep 2024 00:27:33 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
>>> in alt.abortion with message-id
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 9/7/2024 11:49 PM, Attila wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Right! Like it or not, Roe is gone. And therefore, legislatures can ban
>>>>>> abortion even though a fetus is not a person.
>>>>>
>>>>> True. But that can be reversed with the proper legal steps.
>>>>
>>>> You are expecting SCOTUS to reverse course and reinstate Roe? Sorry, no.
>>>
>>> Of course not, but there could be legislation and/or
>>> Amendments or other court cases that effectively do the same
>>> thing.
>>
>>There can't be other court cases that apply the federal constitution.
>>SCOTUS has spoken and all other courts are bound by their decision.
>
>Sigh. Another SCOTUS case of course.
>
>>
>>Yes, there can be legislation by Congress that forbids the states from
>>banning abortion (even though you said Congress can't do that).
>
>I am not an attorney. I will not argue specific laws
>because I am not qualified to do so, and neither your
>opinion or mine will impact legal procedures.
That's ok. Josh isn't one either. He just plays one on Usenet.
>
>>
>>> And of course there are several drugs available.
>>
>>I'm not sure what happens to you, but is illegal in Alabama to mail,
>>receive or use these drugs for abortions.
>
>I doubt that will survive a court challenge.
Time will tell.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
