home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   az.politics      Arizona politics      3,152 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 3,004 of 3,152   
   john h. to Attila   
   Re: Fetuses are unborn humans   
   09 Sep 24 09:24:28   
   
   XPost: alt.abortion, talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   XPost: sac.politics   
   From: none@dont-email.me   
      
   On 9/8/2024 1:54 PM, Attila wrote:   
   > On Sun, 8 Sep 2024 08:20:35 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth   
   >  in alt.abortion with message-id   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 9/8/2024 8:13 AM, Attila wrote:   
   >>> On Sun, 8 Sep 2024 07:57:08 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth   
   >>>  in alt.abortion with message-id   
   >>>  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 9/8/2024 4:25 AM, Attila wrote:   
   >>>>> On Sun, 8 Sep 2024 00:27:33 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth   
   >>>>>  in alt.abortion with message-id   
   >>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 9/7/2024 11:49 PM, Attila wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Right! Like it or not, Roe is gone. And therefore, legislatures can   
   ban   
   >>>>>>>> abortion even though a fetus is not a person.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> True.  But that can be reversed with the proper legal steps.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> You are expecting SCOTUS to reverse course and reinstate Roe? Sorry, no.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Of course not, but there could be legislation and/or   
   >>>>> Amendments or other court cases that effectively do the same   
   >>>>> thing.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> There can't be other court cases that apply the federal constitution.   
   >>>> SCOTUS has spoken and all other courts are bound by their decision.   
   >>>   
   >>> Sigh.  Another SCOTUS case of course.   
   >>   
   >> WTF? You just said "of course not" to whether SCOTUS will reinstate Roe,   
   >> and argued that *other* court cases can do the same job. What *other*   
   >> SCOTUS court cases are you talking about?   
   >>   
   >>>> Yes, there can be legislation by Congress that forbids the states from   
   >>>> banning abortion (even though you said Congress can't do that).   
   >>>   
   >>> I am not an attorney.  I will not argue specific laws   
   >>> because I am not qualified to do so, and neither your   
   >>> opinion or mine will impact legal procedures.   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> And of course there are several drugs available.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I'm not sure what happens to you, but is illegal in Alabama to mail,   
   >>>> receive or use these drugs for abortions.   
   >>>   
   >>> I doubt that will survive a court challenge.   
   >>   
   >> Roe is wrong. SCOTUS said Alabama can ban abortion.   
   >>   
   >> At this point I am torn between whether you are an idiot or a troll.   
   >   
   > Neither,  I simply support anything that would reestablish   
   > the right of a  woman to decide whether or not to terminate   
   > her pregnancy.  Not being an attorney I don't know what   
   > legal path would be necessary.   
      
   Abortion is a political red herring.  Women have been killing babies and   
   themselves for centuries.  In modern times, it's used for ethnic   
   population control.  Keeping the black population under control for   
   example using the silly leftism, "a woman's right to choose".  That's   
   complete crap.  It's all about accepting responsibility for one's   
   personal behavior - which liberals are against.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca