Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    az.politics    |    Arizona politics    |    3,153 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,068 of 3,153    |
|    useapen to All    |
|    'Absolutely terrible, shortsighted idea'    |
|    27 Sep 24 07:42:12    |
      XPost: alt.politics.usa.congress, alt.politics.democrats, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh       XPost: talk.politics.guns, sac.politics       From: yourdime@outlook.com              Sen. Kyrsten Sinema on Tuesday ripped Vice President Kamala Harris’       support for scrapping the legislative filibuster to enact federal abortion       rights, drawing praise from Kari Lake, the Republican seeking to succeed       her in the Senate.              A series of comments pulled together the cast of a three-way Senate race       that never really happened but might have if Sinema, a Democrat-turned-       independent, had not dropped out earlier this year.              Rep. Ruben Gallego, the Democrat running for Sinema’s seat, referenced       abortion rights, a favorite wedge issue he raises with Lake, but didn’t       address the filibuster that found new interest.              The exchanges highlighted Sinema’s critical views of her former party as       she winds down her political career.              In an interview with Wisconsin Public Radio, Harris said the Senate should       set aside the rule that effectively requires 60 members to allow a vote       that would reinstate protections erased by the Supreme Court in 2022. It       essentially reaffirmed a position the Biden administration has held since       the high court overturned Roe v. Wade.              “I’ve been very clear, I think we should eliminate the filibuster for Roe,       and get us to the point where 51 votes would be what we need to actually       put back in law the protections for reproductive freedom and for the       ability of every person and every woman to make decisions about their own       body and not have their government tell them what to do,” Harris said.              Her comment drew a pointed rebuke from Sinema, I-Ariz., who has kept a       relatively low profile since quitting the Senate race in March.              “To state the supremely obvious, eliminating the filibuster to codify Roe       v. Wade also enables a future Congress to ban all abortion nationwide,”       Sinema wrote on the social-media platform X. “What an absolutely terrible,       shortsighted idea.”              Lake responded with a post of her own that flattered the woman she       insulted for months on the campaign trail, and sought to claim the support       of those who sided with Sinema on the filibuster issue.              Sinema “is right here,” Lake wrote.              “The filibuster is the minority party’s way of stopping the majority from       shoving radical ideas like Defund the Police, the Green New Deal, and       packing the Supreme Court down America’s throats,” she continued.              “Radical Ruben Gallego would blow up the filibuster and eliminate the       small amount of bipartisanship that still in Washington today. As your       next Senator, I will defend it.”              Gallego, who also has supported setting aside the filibuster for abortion       protections, didn’t offer any immediate reaction but mentioned Lake’s       opposition to abortion rights in a social media post of his own.              “When Kari Lake isn’t calling for an abortion ban, she’s pushing       conspiracy theories and denying elections,” he wrote. “Now she wants to be       your voice. She doesn’t get us, and she sure shouldn’t represent us.”              Sinema quit the Democratic Party in December 2022 as she faced dismal       support from her party, in part over her support for preserving the       legislative filibuster.              Many Democrats saw Sinema as thwarting President Joe Biden’s legislative       agenda by holding to a rule that Democrats could not overcome in a       narrowly divided Senate.              To her critics, that was most evident in January 2022, when Senate       Democrats sought to override laws passed in Republican-controlled states       to make voting harder by passing federal voting rights legislation.              Biden personally met with Sinema and fellow holdout U.S. Sen. Joe Manchin       of West Virginia in a bid to push a Democratic-led bill to the House of       Representatives. Both remained opposed to changing the filibuster rule to       allow a bill on voting rights to proceed.              At the time, Sinema said she backed the Democrats’ bill. Even so, she       would not set aside the filibuster rule to do so, and the measure       predictably died from a Republican blockade.              Sinema’s seatmate, Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., faced reelection months later       and had avoided the filibuster issue throughout his 2020 run, but publicly       said at the time he was willing to set it aside to pass voting-rights       legislation.              If the filibuster was an issue some Democrats wanted to avoid, supporting       abortion rights has been politically popular for them.              Gallego repeatedly has raised that issue throughout his campaign against       Lake. He has said he wants to enact legislation that would restore rights       as they existed before the Dobbs decision that overturned Roe.              By contrast, Lake stumbled on abortion rights after the Arizona Supreme       Court upheld an 1864 territorial law that was a near-total ban on abortion       procedures that Lake energetically supported during her 2022 gubernatorial       run.              In a video released by her Senate campaign, she acknowledged that the       19th-century law “is not where the people are.” That drew pushback from       conservatives who took Lake at her word that she was completely opposed to       abortion.              Now, Harris’ words and Sinema’s reaction bring a light back to the       filibuster.              For Sinema, it was at least the second time in recent weeks that she       publicly criticized her former party.              Earlier this month, Sinema attended the All-In Summit in Los Angeles, a       gathering that drew some of the world’s most prominent venture       capitalists, such as Peter Thiel and Elon Musk.              During that event, Sinema joked that she was “overqualified” to run for       president and when asked “why are the Democrats so anti-capitalist,” she       said, “I don’t understand, because that’s where the money comes from.”              She declared herself to be “fairly Libertarian.”              Sinema has largely avoided the spotlight since her decision not to seek       reelection. In February, she made what may have been her final push for       bipartisan legislation with the border security bill that Gallego and       other Democrats — including Biden and Harris — said they supported.              That measure failed under a Republican filibuster supported by former       President Donald Trump, who wanted to avoid handing Biden an election-year       triumph. Lake also trashed the bill.              An uncharacteristically emotional Sinema denounced partisan politics as       the bill met its demise.              “But less than 24 hours after we released the bill, my Republican       colleagues changed their minds,” she said then. “Turns out they want all       talk and no action. It turns out border security is not actually a risk to       our national security. It’s just a talking point for the election.”              In January, when Sinema remained a possible election rival, Lake lumped       her in with Biden and Gallego as the problem in Washington.              “When Republicans take back the U.S. Senate, we will fix the problems              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca