On Wed Oct-26-2016 11:53, mark lewis (1:3634/12.73) wrote to Roger Nelson:

 ml> 26 Oct 16 06:53, you wrote to Paul Quinn:

[...]

 ml> does your tosser toss them into your badmessages or dupes area OR
 ml> does it toss them into the echo they are supposed to be in?

Both, depending on the path.

 ml> if your tosser tosses them into your badmessages or dupes area,
 ml> then it has caught them as a duplicate... otherwise, it has missed
 ml> that they are a dupe (unless your tosser has a setting to keep them
 ml> in the original echo)... 

Bad_Msgs area.

 ml> in most cases, the system ""above"" you that sends the dupes to you
 ml> should catch them... it may not be able to do so if its dupe
 ml> database gets flushed of dupe data real quickly because of the
 ml> amount of traffic it handles... that's if that system even has dupe
 ml> detection enabled... they may not have it enabled if they elect to
 ml> send all mail on to their connections and let them determine if it
 ml> is a dupe or not... they may decide to do that so as to avoid false
 ml> positives being stopped and not propogating...

But that system's dupe detector worked well for years and years until lately.
No, I believe the problem lies in a misconfiguration somewhere eles.


Regards,

Roger 
--- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+ W10 (1607)
 * Origin: NCS BBS - Houma, LoUiSiAna - (1:3828/7)