HEllo Paul,

Paul Quinn (3:640/384) wrote to Richard Webb:


 RW> Was working on another batch project, my vessels
 RW> reconciliation file we talked about in this echo, cleaning
 RW> up the reports it generates and ...

PQ> This is good.  Yes, I like to hear stories like this.  At least
PQ> someone else is still doing BATch stuff.  Sometimes I get an itch to
PQ> do a reality check when I'm doing the stuff I do here.  :)  No one
PQ> else sees it... luckily. 

But it's so darned useful.  Even if you can get it into
comma delimited you can then get it into a database manager, and thence to
about anything else.

since then, no doubt over a year ago I've pretty much
stabilized what I'm doing with all that stuff.  Since then
I've rolled a pretty good little routine for checking out
*.tic files that nef choked on for whatever reason and
telling me more about them.  I know these days you're using
your tic file processor written in batch.  I still have
other links though, and coordinate a small fdn so I'm still
using a full blown tic processor.

My latest project is some msg area analysis stuff.  I'll
drop in in a couple weeks if you're interested and give you
a look see at some of it.
Hmmm, for that matter might be back with some questions for
the gurus around here.

Btw did you ever get that routine you were working on for
busting email digests to post as fido msgs working the way
you wanted?

Regards,
           Richard
--- timEd 1.10.y2k+
 * Origin:  (1:116/901)