MSGID: 1:396/45.0 f9a218b0
REPLY: 1:153/757.2 5913aa99
CHRS: IBMPC 2
Hello Alan.



> I have had to change my netmail routing to another node that doesn't
> exhibit this aberrant behaviour.

 AI> I haven't looked at the input .pkt so here is my guess.

> Any views on this?

 AI> Was the packet addressed to 1:261/38? The packet header I mean. The
 AI> messages within the packet could have been echomail or netmail
 AI> addressed to any node and those message will be forwarded on as
 AI> usual.

The mail bundle was addressed to 261/38 for forwarding purposes.  The packet
would have been addressed to 2:333/808.7. In yet another case the mail bundle
was again addressed to 1:261/38 and the packet would have been addressed to
2:221/360.  Those two were never delivered until I resent them to a different
node with international connections and a different tosser.  Those were
promptly delivered to their destinations by whatever group of intervening
nodes.

[snip]
 AI> If that packet was addressed to 1:261/38 (the packet, not the
 AI> messages inside) the tosser there will likely act on it as needed.

If by packet you actually mean the mail bundle, then yes the affected bundles
went to 1:261/38.

Best regards,
Marc

--- timEd/2 1.10.y2k+
 * Origin: Sursum Corda! BBS-Huntsville,AL-bbs.sursum-corda.com (1:396/45)
SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 120/340 123/131 129/305 226/30 227/114 229/101
SEEN-BY: 229/424 426 452 550 664 1016 240/5832 249/206 317 292/854
SEEN-BY: 317/3 322/757 342/200
PATH: 396/45 280/464 229/101 426