home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

 Message 4596 
 Richard Falken to Jas Hud 
 Re: Synchronet vs. Mystic 
 11 May 22 15:29:09 
 
TZUTC: -0500
MSGID: 1040.fido_bbscarni@1:123/115 26e156a5
REPLY: 1:129/305 70287fda
PID: Synchronet 3.19c-Linux master/2962e4a5b Apr 24 2022 GCC 11.2.0
TID: SBBSecho 3.15-Linux master/2962e4a5b Apr 24 2022 GCC 11.2.0
COLS: 80
BBSID: PALANT
CHRS: ASCII 1
NOTE: Synchronet msgeditor master/2962e4a5b
  Re: Re: Synchronet vs. Mystic
  By: Jas Hud to Richard Falken on Tue May 10 2022 07:31 am

 > if you're runing *nix you need to compile it.
 > 
 > i think these guys here were talking about actually modifying the source.
 > they're saying that synchronet is so configurable that it's not necessary.
 > people still edit the source and have their own little versions.
 > 
 > probably the one thing people weren't happy about was the file areas and how
 > they handled LFN and listings.  there were a few guys playing around with th
 > and maybe some of their ideas or modifications made into the latest release.
 > 
 > there are some things that are hard coded that i can see people wanting to
 > change. for example some of the color settings are in attr.cfg.  that's just
 > little text file that handles SOME of the colors:
 > i think it's obvious to most people that these values belong in the text.dat
 > if i was enthusiastic enough about bbsing and we had some users, i'd probabl
 > make this change for my own system.   BUT..... if there was another release
 > i'd just be screwed and have to work around their next changes.
 > it would be better to get them to accept the changes and then submit it.
 > 

The beauty of open source is that you don't need upstream to cooperate. It is
so, so much better if they cooperate, but for most hobby programs, you can just
put your fork on some sort of vercion control system that allows merging
changes from upstream in an automated way. Not ideal, but serviceable for hobby
projects.

I have posted this elsewhere, but my opinion is that using open source programs
is the natural path for BBSing, since BBSing is a hobby, and hobbyism is all
about tweaking and looking under the hood of things. Even if you don't make
many changes, it is cool to try to figure out how things work.

--
gopher://gopher.richardfalken.com/1/richardfalken
--- SBBSecho 3.15-Linux
 * Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (1:123/115)
SEEN-BY: 1/120 123 15/0 18/0 200 50/109 90/1 105/81 106/201 114/705
SEEN-BY: 116/116 120/340 123/0 25 115 120 126 131 180 200 755 129/305
SEEN-BY: 129/330 331 135/300 153/250 757 7715 154/10 218/700 840 220/70
SEEN-BY: 221/1 6 222/2 226/17 30 100 227/114 229/110 111 206 317 400
SEEN-BY: 229/424 426 428 452 470 550 664 700 240/1120 250/1 5 8 266/512
SEEN-BY: 267/800 275/1000 280/464 282/1038 298/25 299/6 300/4 301/1
SEEN-BY: 301/113 305/3 317/3 320/219 322/757 335/364 341/66 342/200
SEEN-BY: 396/45 460/58 467/888 633/280 712/848 1321 770/1 3634/0 12
SEEN-BY: 3634/15 24 27 50 119 4500/1 5001/100 5005/49 5019/40 5020/715
SEEN-BY: 5020/1042 4441 5054/8 5058/104 5064/56 5083/444 5090/958
PATH: 123/115 3634/12 5020/1042 301/1 221/6 218/840 770/1 317/3
PATH: 229/426


<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca