Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 263  |
|  Tom Moore to All  |
|  Qwk Vs Ftn  |
|  04 Dec 24 11:06:40  |
 TZUTC: -0500 MSGID: 1.fidonet_bbs_internet@1:135/205 2bb5b411 PID: Synchronet 3.20a-Linux master/6e166f09d Dec 02 202 GCC 13.2.0 TID: SBBSecho 3.23-Linux master/6e166f09d Dec 02 2024 14:11 GCC 13.2.0 BBSID: CWSHACK CHRS: CP437 2 It looks like my last message went to the wrong echo. Hope this one goes to the correct one this time. What are some good points and bad points of Ftn's vs Qwk networking? At this point from what I know Ftn allows for multiple levels of message distribution. When it comes to Qwk there seems to be a requirement for one system to be the central feed point for all nodes. Tom ... MultiMail, the new multi-platform, multi-format offline reader! === MultiMail/Linux v0.52 --- SBBSecho 3.23-Linux * Origin: Cw Shack Bbs - kf4yey.com (1:135/205) SEEN-BY: 1/120 18/0 103/705 104/119 105/81 106/201 116/116 120/616 SEEN-BY: 123/0 25 126 180 755 3001 3002 124/5016 128/187 129/305 135/0 SEEN-BY: 135/115 205 220 240 363 382 384 385 388 390 391 153/757 7715 SEEN-BY: 154/10 30 50 700 203/0 218/700 220/6 20 90 221/0 6 222/2 SEEN-BY: 226/18 30 44 50 227/114 229/110 114 200 206 300 310 317 400 SEEN-BY: 229/426 428 470 550 664 700 705 240/1120 5832 250/1 266/512 SEEN-BY: 275/1000 280/464 5003 5006 282/1038 291/111 292/854 301/1 SEEN-BY: 310/31 320/219 322/757 341/66 234 342/200 396/45 423/120 SEEN-BY: 460/16 58 256 1124 467/888 633/280 712/848 1321 770/1 902/26 SEEN-BY: 2320/105 3634/0 12 24 27 57 58 119 5020/400 8912 5054/30 SEEN-BY: 5075/35 PATH: 135/205 115 3634/12 154/10 280/464 460/58 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]