XPost: bc.politics, van.general, vic.general   
   From: gregpcarr@yahoo.ca   
      
   On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:01:48 -0700, "cognomen@domus.ca"   
    wrote:   
      
   >   
   >"Newsfly13" wrote in message   
   >news:1b43a49a-11d9-4a64-8508-1e0807fe9f28@x12g2000yqx.googlegroups.com...   
   >>I was never a fan of Vander Zalm back when he was in government. But   
   >>seeing him in the spotlight with his anti-HST campaign here has   
   >>brought me to the realization that what this province is in dire need   
   >>of a credible opposition. The NDP don't cut it any more. For one,   
   >>they just don't have the talent right now to be heard. Secondly their   
   >>last spate in power convinced the electorate that the BC NDP is   
   >>largely ideologically irrelevant and incompetent.   
   >   
   >Yeah, yeah, yeah . . . . .   
   >_____________   
   >   
   >Angus Reid Poll shows NDP ahead   
   >   
   >A poll conducted by Angus Reid Strategies from March 13 to 15, 2010 had the   
   following   
   >provincial results (Source Data):   
   >   
   >NDP - 43%   
   >BC Liberal - 35%   
   >Green - 13%   
   >Conservative - 6%   
   >   
   >905 people were sampled, error factor of 3.3%.   
   >   
   >These results are not surprising given the backlash over the HST.   
   >____________________________   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >>The Campbell government, meanwhile, continues unchecked in their stealthy   
   >>underhanded work of transforming what "B.C." means (from "British   
   >>Columbia", as it were) to "Bring Cash" ...   
   >   
   >   
   >Especially to their newly-licenced mega casinos. You know, the ones they   
   blasTed the NDP   
   >for even considering when the NDP was government?   
   >   
   Glad to see the Conservatives once again become a force in BC   
   politics. The Liberals have overstayed their welcome and their is a   
   need for a second center-right party for ppl who will never vote NDP.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|