XPost: alt.usenet.kooks, alt.fan.karl-malden.nose   
   From: spooge@databasix.com   
      
   Mad as a Box of Frogs <~.¤@¤.~> wrote in   
   news:hrg78v$du4$1@undertow.eternal-september.org:   
      
   > spooge   wrote:   
   >>Mad as a Box of Frogs <~.¤@¤.~> wroteL   
   >>   
   >>> Ted Crackerwagon  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>"Mad as a Box of Frogs" <~.¤@¤.~> wrote in   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>Rhondumb Lea Kirk Fries   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Is a stunned tw@t.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Hi, Maabof. Long time, no see.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Missed ya Tedster, noticed your pal's ISP got nuked huh...   
   >>> cox got shrivelled.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>>So the suit came to a resolution, I see.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Fat lady hasn't sung. IMO the NSPs who have not removed the libel   
   >>> are ripe for picking next.... news at eleven. Google Lawrence   
   >>> Godfrey.   
   >>   
   >>The judge's ruling specifically relies upon the CDA which saves   
   >>carriers of messages harmless from claims of defamation etc.  The CDA   
   >>also applies to all but 1 of the named defendants and the claim   
   >>against those parties has been dismissed as a result.   
   >>   
   >>Go read the last two filed documents and count the dismissals.  Take   
   >>special note of the 2 *with prejudice*.   
   >>   
   >>What a spectacular failure was that silly suit.   
   >>   
   >>At one time I thought you were just playing at being stupid.  I've   
   >>changed my mind about that over the course of this silly situation.   
   >>   
   >>Not that I'm trying to disuade you from posting your ignorance as   
   >>often as possible.  Consider this to be the beginning of your campaign   
   >>for some well deserved recognition of your kookiness.   
   >   
   >   
   > You (a kOoK BC family lawyer coaching suicide for ten years on Usenet)   
   > and your fellow koOks saw to cratering AUK is what's hilarious about   
   > this.   
      
   And immediately the fuckhead posts what he believes to be personal   
   information.   
      
   No surprise, you're a cowardly little fuck with no morals and even less   
   intelligence.   
      
   I'm still waiting for you to provide proof that you've   
   emailed/faxed/called/telegraphed/astral-planed/ESP-connected or otherwise   
   confirmed which law school I graduated from so I can get a transcript and   
   apply to the Bar.   
      
   I've suggested to many losers that they should consider removing themselves   
   from an existance that they aren't enjoying.  I think everyone should have   
   the right to pull their own plug.  That said, I don't want you to do that   
   because you're much too much fun to play with here on Usenet.   
      
   > CN Win lose or draw, the real winners are the rest of us human beings   
   > that will go the distance laughing our farking aces off at you   
   > (especially) for the circle jerk your bloated ego ilk thought they had   
   > down pat. You sir are a ethically castrated leftover. Enjoy.   
      
   Let's see:  posteing what you think is personal information and adding a   
   group that is "local" to me.  Yup, you know ethical castration alright.   
   Hands-on experience at that.   
      
   It proves to me that you can't deal with Usenet on Usenet, you're   
   intellectually unarmed so you have to revert to trying to intimidate by   
   hinting at real-life action.  If you had any brains you'd have realized by   
   now that I don't intimidate.  I've dealt with much smarter, meaner   
   fuckheads here on Usenet and in real life than you, Chum.   
      
   >>>>Did that bearing co really go >bankrupt?   
   >>>   
   >>> Tanked.   
   >>   
   >>As did how many thousands of other companies in the economic meltdown?   
   >> Manufacturing industries were hit hard while your welfare checks came   
   >>in uninterrupted.  Perhaps that's why you're so ignorant on the   
   >>subject.   
   >   
   > Tanked. What do you not understand about going bankrupt and   
   > stiffing all your creditors for thousands of dollars so as to   
   > never regain footing again in a forum or business community of   
   > your peers?   
      
   Your ignorance of how the real world works hangs from you like the hand-me-   
   down dresses your mother sent you to school in. No wonder the other boys   
   laughed at you.   
      
   >>Connecting the situation the company found itself in and the lawsuit   
   >>is just another example of the lengths you shitheads go to to "flame".   
   >>On another level, that you'd take pleasure from the possibility of any   
   >>company and its employees facing economic issues for whatever reason   
   >>betrays you for the morally bankrupt piece of shit you clearly are.   
   >   
   > Nice try John Boyd, BC family lawyer. When you begin to celebrate the   
   > moral integrity I've enjoyed for twenty years or more on this medium,   
   > we'll gladly review your postition as teabag target (translated my   
   > balls on your forehead) for the duration.   
      
   You're a fuckhead and an idiot, and I own you on Usenet.  You prove it   
   every time you think you're going real life on me, dipshit.   
      
   >>I'm a romantic adventure   
   >   
   > You're a civil servant lawyer employed by the Province of British   
   > Columbia authoring hatred on a public medium is what you are.   
      
   Not one word of that sentence is correct. You've been making this claim for   
   probably a year now and have failed to back up your words inspite of   
   numerous challenges to do so.   
      
   You're creating quite a conundrum for yourself, kook.  You can continue to   
   claim to be correct and make posts that you believe will cause professional   
   issues for a lawyer in BC with the surname of Boyd, or you can admit that   
   you're wrong and confess to being an incredibly stupid person but avoid -   
   you hope - being held accountable for attempting to cause problems for an   
   innocent, uninvolved, unconnected third party.   
      
   For the last time I'm going to help you help yourself out of a situation   
   that could turn ugly for you should you persist as you have.   
      
   My middle initial isn't E.  My high school class graduated in 1976. I'll be   
   52 later this year.  I have 2 grand children. I am not now, nor have I ever   
   been a lawyer. I'm not the person you insist I am.   
      
   You've knowingly published material that you intended to be professionally   
   damaging and linked that material to someone who has nothing to do with   
   me/my posts because that person isn't me.  For a year I've told you many   
   times that your information is wrong, however you've persisted in your   
   postings.  In case you have in mind that you're protected by a defense of   
   innocent mistake you can't claim such when you've insisted, publicly, that   
   you are right in the face of my advices to you to the contrary.   
      
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)