XPost: alt.usenet.kooks, alt.fan.karl-malden.nose   
   From: ~.¤@¤.~   
      
   In article ,   
   The Greatest  wrote:   
   >   
   >"spooge"  wrote in message   
   >news:Xns9D6B9F92F9535ScourgeOfUsenet@208.90.168.18...   
   >> Mad as a Box of Frogs <~.¤@¤.~> wrote in   
   >> news:hrg78v$du4$1@undertow.eternal-september.org:   
   >>   
   >> > spooge   wrote:   
   >> >>Mad as a Box of Frogs <~.¤@¤.~> wroteL   
   >> >>   
   >> >>> Ted Crackerwagon  wrote:   
   >> >>>>   
   >> >>>>"Mad as a Box of Frogs" <~.¤@¤.~> wrote in   
   >> >>>>   
   >> >>>>>>Rhondumb Lea Kirk Fries   
   >> >>>>>   
   >> >>>>>   
   >> >>>>>   
   >> >>>>> Is a stunned tw@t.   
   >> >>>>   
   >> >>>>Hi, Maabof. Long time, no see.   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>> Missed ya Tedster, noticed your pal's ISP got nuked huh...   
   >> >>> cox got shrivelled.   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>>>So the suit came to a resolution, I see.   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>> Fat lady hasn't sung. IMO the NSPs who have not removed the libel   
   >> >>> are ripe for picking next.... news at eleven. Google Lawrence   
   >> >>> Godfrey.   
   >> >>   
   >> >>The judge's ruling specifically relies upon the CDA which saves   
   >> >>carriers of messages harmless from claims of defamation etc.  The CDA   
   >> >>also applies to all but 1 of the named defendants and the claim   
   >> >>against those parties has been dismissed as a result.   
   >> >>   
   >> >>Go read the last two filed documents and count the dismissals.  Take   
   >> >>special note of the 2 *with prejudice*.   
   >> >>   
   >> >>What a spectacular failure was that silly suit.   
   >> >>   
   >> >>At one time I thought you were just playing at being stupid.  I've   
   >> >>changed my mind about that over the course of this silly situation.   
   >> >>   
   >> >>Not that I'm trying to disuade you from posting your ignorance as   
   >> >>often as possible.  Consider this to be the beginning of your campaign   
   >> >>for some well deserved recognition of your kookiness.   
   >> >   
   >> >   
   >> > You (a kOoK BC family lawyer coaching suicide for ten years on Usenet)   
   >> > and your fellow koOks saw to cratering AUK is what's hilarious about   
   >> > this.   
   >>   
   >> And immediately the fuckhead posts what he believes to be personal   
   >> information.   
   >>   
   >> No surprise, you're a cowardly little fuck with no morals and even less   
   >> intelligence.   
   >>   
   >> I'm still waiting for you to provide proof that you've   
   >> emailed/faxed/called/telegraphed/astral-planed/ESP-connected or otherwise   
   >> confirmed which law school I graduated from so I can get a transcript and   
   >> apply to the Bar.   
   >>   
   >> I've suggested to many losers that they should consider removing themselves   
   >> from an existance that they aren't enjoying.  I think everyone should have   
   >> the right to pull their own plug.  That said, I don't want you to do that   
   >> because you're much too much fun to play with here on Usenet.   
   >>   
   >> > CN Win lose or draw, the real winners are the rest of us human beings   
   >> > that will go the distance laughing our farking aces off at you   
   >> > (especially) for the circle jerk your bloated ego ilk thought they had   
   >> > down pat. You sir are a ethically castrated leftover. Enjoy.   
   >>   
   >> Let's see:  posteing what you think is personal information and adding a   
   >> group that is "local" to me.  Yup, you know ethical castration alright.   
   >> Hands-on experience at that.   
   >>   
   >> It proves to me that you can't deal with Usenet on Usenet, you're   
   >> intellectually unarmed so you have to revert to trying to intimidate by   
   >> hinting at real-life action.  If you had any brains you'd have realized by   
   >> now that I don't intimidate.  I've dealt with much smarter, meaner   
   >> fuckheads here on Usenet and in real life than you, Chum.   
   >>   
   >> >>>>Did that bearing co really go >bankrupt?   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>> Tanked.   
   >> >>   
   >> >>As did how many thousands of other companies in the economic meltdown?   
   >> >> Manufacturing industries were hit hard while your welfare checks came   
   >> >>in uninterrupted.  Perhaps that's why you're so ignorant on the   
   >> >>subject.   
   >> >   
   >> > Tanked. What do you not understand about going bankrupt and   
   >> > stiffing all your creditors for thousands of dollars so as to   
   >> > never regain footing again in a forum or business community of   
   >> > your peers?   
   >>   
   >> Your ignorance of how the real world works hangs from you like the hand-me-   
   >> down dresses your mother sent you to school in. No wonder the other boys   
   >> laughed at you.   
   >>   
   >> >>Connecting the situation the company found itself in and the lawsuit   
   >> >>is just another example of the lengths you shitheads go to to "flame".   
   >> >>On another level, that you'd take pleasure from the possibility of any   
   >> >>company and its employees facing economic issues for whatever reason   
   >> >>betrays you for the morally bankrupt piece of shit you clearly are.   
   >> >   
   >> > Nice try John Boyd, BC family lawyer. When you begin to celebrate the   
   >> > moral integrity I've enjoyed for twenty years or more on this medium,   
   >> > we'll gladly review your postition as teabag target (translated my   
   >> > balls on your forehead) for the duration.   
   >>   
   >> You're a fuckhead and an idiot, and I own you on Usenet.  You prove it   
   >> every time you think you're going real life on me, dipshit.   
   >>   
   >> >>I'm a romantic adventure   
   >> >   
   >> > You're a civil servant lawyer employed by the Province of British   
   >> > Columbia authoring hatred on a public medium is what you are.   
   >>   
   >> Not one word of that sentence is correct. You've been making this claim for   
   >> probably a year now and have failed to back up your words inspite of   
   >> numerous challenges to do so.   
   >>   
   >> You're creating quite a conundrum for yourself, kook.  You can continue to   
   >> claim to be correct and make posts that you believe will cause professional   
   >> issues for a lawyer in BC with the surname of Boyd, or you can admit that   
   >> you're wrong and confess to being an incredibly stupid person but avoid -   
   >> you hope - being held accountable for attempting to cause problems for an   
   >> innocent, uninvolved, unconnected third party.   
   >>   
   >> For the last time I'm going to help you help yourself out of a situation   
   >> that could turn ugly for you should you persist as you have.   
   >>   
   >> My middle initial isn't E.  My high school class graduated in 1976. I'll be   
   >> 52 later this year.  I have 2 grand children. I am not now, nor have I ever   
   >> been a lawyer. I'm not the person you insist I am.   
   >>   
   >> You've knowingly published material that you intended to be professionally   
   >> damaging and linked that material to someone who has nothing to do with   
   >> me/my posts because that person isn't me.  For a year I've told you many   
   >> times that your information is wrong, however you've persisted in your   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)