Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    bc.general    |    British Columbia general chatter    |    24,289 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 22,431 of 24,289    |
|    alea@iacta.est to All    |
|    Arghhhh !! Here comes the next costliest    |
|    07 Jun 10 17:18:49    |
      XPost: bc.politics, van.general, vic.general              After the Air India trial.              Foreign assholes. Native-born assholes. If they lose, make THEM pay for the       trials out       of their own pockets. And make TWO copies of all witness tapes.       ____________________________________              The Province - June 7, 2010              Basi-Virk trial judge asks jury if they can stay for 10 months              Jurors in the Basi-Virk trial were told Monday that the case may run until the       end of       March, a dramatic increase in the time originally estimated.              B.C. Supreme Court Associate Chief Justice Anne MacKenzie told the jury, which       has been       waiting for more than two weeks for the trial to resume following several       adjournments,       that in their absence trial scheduling matters were discussed.              She said the original estimate of five to six weeks for the trial, given       during jury       selection, had changed.              “Can you accommodate us until the end of March with whatever miscallaneous       days you need       off?” asked the judge.       “That’s the surprise, because that’s what the scheduling is. I know that       you’ve been       extremely cooperative but we would be and are prepared to accommodate you.”              The judge said the new schedule will likely call on the jury to have much of       the summer       off and two weeks at Christmas.       “There are many long trials in this courthouse,” she added. “That’s the way       longer trials       run, with accommodations.”       The judge did not go into any details about the reasons for the sudden       increase in trial       time required.              Several jurors nodded their heads and the judge asked the 12-member panel to       retire to       consider her request.              About 30 minutes later, the jury returned.              The judge said that she understood that 10 of the jurors are able to continue       with the       trial but that two needed to take the evening to consider their availability.              She said the lawyers in the case were planning to return to court Tuesday       morning to       continue their consideration of the scheduling issues, looking at how long       each witness is       expected to take.              The judge asked the two jurors to advise the sheriff by Tuesday morning if       they are able       to continue and asked that the entire jury return to court on Wednesday.              Where the number of jurors goes below 10, a mistrial must be declared.              Two alternates are chosen during jury selection but are excused once the trial       gets under       way if they are not required.       Outside court, the lawyers had little comment.              NDP justice critic Leonard Krog said that “obviously the trial is not getting       off to a       quick start. This is not a horserace, clearly. It’s more the engine getting       revved and we’re       moving forward but very, very slowly.”              Krog added that he never thought the trial would take six weeks, that it was a       “very low”       estimate.       “Whatever reasons may be offered by either the Crown or defence for that, I       just think       that’s grossly inadquate, given the number of documents that were known to be       part of this       case.”              The trial was to have begun May 17 but was delayed for a day due to issues       that were       discussed in the absence of the jury.       Those submissions cannot be reported on due to a publication ban imposed on       anything       discussed without the jury.              The first witness, Premier Gordon Campbell’s chief of staff Martyn Brown,       testified for       three days.              However at that point the trial came to a grinding halt, before Brown could       complete his       cross-examination.              First, one of the accused, Aneal Basi, fell ill and the case was delayed for a       week.              Then other issues, which again cannot be reported on, arose.              David Basi and Bobby Virk, former ministerial aides in the Campbell       government, have       pleaded not guilty to breach of trust and fraud. The’re alleged to have traded       confidential information about the controversial $1 billion sale of B.C. Rail       in exchange       for       benefits.              Aneal Basi, a cousin of Dave Basi, has pleaded not guilty to money-laundering.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca