Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    bc.general    |    British Columbia general chatter    |    24,289 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 22,717 of 24,289    |
|    40%®Çonned to All    |
|    BC about to send the HST - back to Harpe    |
|    06 Aug 11 18:18:27    |
      XPost: can.politics, bc.politics, van.general       XPost: vic.general       From: 40%®Çonned@cda.ca              Looks like it. Apparently the 'new Premier' may have made some very bad       choices about how to       bring the HST issue to a vote for British Columbians. And now fewer are       needed to quash the tax       than if they had proceeded under the Initiative Legislation - instead of the       Referendum Act.              I imagine the year that the tax has been in place will more than pay what is       now going to be       owing to the Harper Cons - as a return of their 'incentive' money to BC - aka       'bribe money'. If       not, let THEM figure it out. I think BC is about to become HST-free.       _____________________________________       By Vaughn Palmer, Vancouver Sun August 6, 2011              Liberals' rush to have HST vote over could be undoing of the tax              The provincial Referendum Act says precisely how the B.C. Liberals should       respond if the verdict       of the just-completed ballot-by-mail is a "Yes" to getting rid of the       harmonized sales tax.              "If more than 50 per cent of the validly cast ballots vote the same way on a       question stated,"       says the act, "that result is binding on the government that initiated the       referendum."              B.C.'s initiative legislation, which gave rise to last year's anti-HST       petition and set the       stage for this year's provincewide vote, would have left the government a lot       more manoeuvring       room.              To get rid of the tax, opponents would have needed to attract the support of       50 per cent of all       registered voters, not just 50 per cent of how many actually voted. Nor would       the Liberals have       been obliged to do more than table the Bill Vander Zalm-initiated HST       Extinguishment Act in the       legislature.              But the Liberals, seeking to move up the decision by a few weeks and allow       balloting by mail,       voided the initiative vote scheduled for Sept. 24, and proceeded under a       different piece of       legislation, the Referendum Act, with the process that is scheduled to yield       up a result on Aug.       25.              They thereby opened themselves to a binding obligation should British       Columbians vote "Yes" to       the ballot question, namely "extinguishing the harmonized sales tax and       reinstating the       provincial sales tax in conjunction with the goods and services tax."              The legislation further obliges the government to act promptly and decisively       to follow the       dictates of the electorate: "If the results of a referendum are binding, the       government must, as       soon as practicable, take steps, within the competence of the government, that       the government       considers necessary or advisable to implement the results of the referendum."              In the case of a vote to extinguish the you-know-what, it has to be recognized       that the hated       levy is actually a federal tax, collected under the national Excise Act with       the consent of the       province, under conditions set down in a comprehensive agreement negotiated       between Victoria and       Ottawa back in 2009.              So the starting point for the Liberals would have to be an approach to the       federal government to       negotiate a way out of that agreement as soon as practicable. Ottawa, be it       noted, would be       holding most of the cards.              The tax agreement covered the five years ending July 1, 2015, and the province       agreed that       should the terms be breached at this end, the federal government would be       entitled to recover       the full $1.6 billion in transition funding provided to the provincial       treasury as of July of       this year.              There'd be administrative costs, time constraints and other considerations.       The negotiations       would be proceeding into unknown territory because at the time the agreement       was struck, neither       government contemplated the possibility of de-harmonization and a return to       the PST/GST       combination.              Nevertheless, as the independent HST panel noted in its report on the prospect       last spring: "It       can't be done quickly; however, it is possible to go back."              I expect the Liberals would be aiming to wrap up the talks with Ottawa as soon       as practicable       (there's that phrase again) in order to expedite the other changes necessary       to fulfil the       verdict of the referendum.              The Referendum Act says those steps should include the following: "Changing       programs or       policies, or introducing new programs or policies, that are administered by or       through the       executive government" and/or "introducing legislation in the legislative       assembly during its       first session after the results of such a referendum are known."              The provincial house is expected to sit this fall, probably starting Oct. 4.       Before bringing in       legislation to restore the provincial sales tax, the Liberals would probably       consult the public       about the details of re-implementation.              Perhaps they would make use of the legislature finance committee, which tours       the province to       conduct budget consultations every fall in any event.              The tour could give people the opportunity to say whether they want the PST       restored precisely       as it was, or with some changes, such as ending the exemption for restaurant       meals. The       committee also could consider whether the province needed to undertake other       measures to       encourage investment and growth to offset the pending end to the HST.              But I expect the Liberals would try to minimize appearances that they are       punishing the people       with higher taxes and/or spending cuts to make up for the loss of HST revenue       and transition       funding. More likely they would simply add the cost of phasing out the tax to       the provincial       debt and move on.              The independent panel reckoned the whole process untangling the harmonized       sales tax and       re-establishing two separate tax regimes would take 18 to 24 months.              The Liberals would be pushing to get it done sooner rather than later. If they       do indeed lose       the referendum, they'll be looking to put this public policy disaster behind       them as quickly and       painlessly as possible.                     *******************************************************       "We CAN look after each other better than we do today.       We CAN have a fiscally responsible government.       We CAN have a strong economy; greater equality; a clean environment.       We CAN be a force for peace in the world." - Jack Layton              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca