Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    bc.general    |    British Columbia general chatter    |    24,289 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 22,950 of 24,289    |
|    Çons@30%@can.ca to All    |
|    Mulcair and his wife    |
|    25 Mar 12 15:43:08    |
      XPost: can.politics, ont.politics, mtl.general       XPost: tor.general       From: Çons@30%              Personal data - Thomas Mulcair              Date of birth October 24, 1954 (age 57)       Place of birth Ottawa, Ontario       Political party New Democratic Party       Spouse Catherine Pinhas       Residence Montreal, Quebec, Canada       Profession Attorney, professor, politician       Religion Roman Catholic              He has been married to Catherine Pinhas since 1976.       She is a psychologist with Turkish-Jewish heritage who was born in France, and       the couple have       two sons.              In 1992, he conducted a wonderful spat with Augustin Roy, the hopelessly       superannuated head of       the Quebec Corporation of Physicians. Dr. Roy saw nothing wrong with an       Ottawa psychiatrist,       who had pleaded guilty to serial sexual misconduct with a patient, taking up       residence at a       Montreal hospital. Mr. Mulcair disagreed - all over the news. At one point       he described a       "donnybrook" of a conversation with Dr. Roy, who responded that Mr. Mulcair       was a "disgrace to       the legal profession."       This was an easy target, perhaps, but Mr. Mulcair didn't miss.              "The laws don't exist to protect faulty practitioners," he thundered. "They       exist to protect       the public. If Dr. Roy doesn't realize that, he'll be made to realize that."        The psychiatrist       soon fled to Argentina, never to be heard from again except in relation to       patient-protection       legislation that Mr. Mulcair championed. Dr. Roy was gone two years later.        Consumer       protection is a key focus of Mr. Mulcair's leadership campaign.              As a "star candidate" for the Liberals in the 1994 provincial election - a       stark battle between       separatism and federalism - Mr. Mulcair was front and centre in public       debates, warning of       economic doom should the PQ, let alone the Yes campaign, prevail.              In 2006, rather than accept a demotion, he abruptly quit and was soon       campaigning for the       federal NDP in Outremont, a Liberal bastion that he took surprisingly easily       in a byelection.       He claimed the resignation was a matter of principle: The government wanted to       give provincial       parkland to developers; he refused to approve. But anonymous sources muttered       darkly that he       simply wasn't a team player.              In a 2011 profile in L'Actualité, veteran Liberal MNA Pierre Paradis recalled       Mr. Mulcair as a       "ruthless warrior."              There was the time, in a television studio in 2002, when he yelled, "I can't       wait to see you in       prison you old c---," at a former PQ minister he had accused of influence       peddling. Said former       minister successfully sued Mr. Mulcair for $95,000.              In the Vancouver debate last weekend, Paul Dewar suggested that unlike the       "happy warrior" Mr.       Layton, Mr. Mulcair was too much warrior, and not happy enough, to lead the       party in which       everyone is supposed to play nice.              This, surely, is another conceit. Jack Laytons don't grow on trees. And one of       the many things       Mr. Mulcair and his leadership opponents agree on is the notion that       Conservatives are quite       literally tearing apart the moral, social and economic fabric of Canada. Why       shouldn't their       leader be angry?              "I think, watching Parliament, that [Mr. Mulcair] is the only one who can go       head-tohead with       Stephen Harper and Bob Rae on a consistent basis, day to day," says Mr.       Nystrom.              At some point, the New Democrats will have to confront the realities of what       they hope to       achieve. Nice guys and ideologues might finish second now and again in       Canadian politics. But       none has ever finished first.              *******************************************************       "We CAN look after each other better than we do today.       We CAN have a fiscally responsible government.       We CAN have a strong economy; greater equality; a clean environment.       We CAN be a force for peace in the world." - Jack Layton              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca