Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    bc.general    |    British Columbia general chatter    |    24,289 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 23,385 of 24,289    |
|    =?UTF-8?B?Q29uyYBSQ29uyYA=?= to All    |
|    Christy Clark - easily bought by Harper     |
|    08 Oct 13 16:25:12    |
      XPost: bc.politics, van.general, vic.general       XPost: nanaimo.general, can.politics       From: ConsRCons@govt.cda              First the Harper Cons closed coast guard stations on the west coast, now       they're using 'reopening and adding ships' as a bribe for the tarsands       pipeline.              Cons - they come by the name honestly. And Christy Clark - she comes by       the name of 'a Con in LIberal clothing' - just as honestly.              When did the Coast Guard - at taxpayer cost - become an insurance policy       for the tarsands oil companies ?                     This was less than a year ago:       _________________________________________              Dec 6, 2012              Poll shows cuts to Canadian Coast Guard could cost Conservative cabinet       minister John Duncan his seat in Vancouver Island North              Poll shows cuts to Canadian Coast Guard could cost Conservative cabinet       minister John Duncan his seat in Vancouver Island North; voters strongly       oppose planned closure of Kitsilano Coast Guard Station and Vancouver,       Comox, Tofino Marine Communications & Traffic Services centres              Unions to target Conservative MPs with narrow election wins over Coast       Guard closures              And unions representing Coast Guard workers say things will only get       worse for BC Conservative MPs if they refuse to listen to public opinion       opposing closures.              The poll of 648 voters in Duncan’s riding found that 79% oppose the       planned closure of the Kitsilano Coast Guard Station and Marine       Communications & Traffic Services centres in Vancouver, Comox and Tofino       that direct and monitor vessels, with 64% strongly disagreeing with the       government decision. The Comox centre is in Duncan’s own riding.              And 76% of those polled by national research firm Strategic       Communications say Duncan’s support for Coast Guard closures makes them       less likely to vote for him and his party in the next election, with 62%       saying his position makes it much less likely.              Opposition to the closures includes 73% of voters who say they supported       Duncan in the 2011 federal election.              “The writing is on the wall for every Conservative Member of Parliament       who supports closing needed Canadian Coast Guard stations and centres in       BC,” says Dave Clark, Union of Canadian Transportation Employees BC       Regional Vice-President, representing workers at the Kitsilano Station.        “Voters will punish them for making a foolish decision and Coast Guard       workers will make sure they know who shut down emergency search and       rescue services.”              “Voters in Vancouver Island North know how important their Marine       Communications & Traffic Services centre in Comox is in coordinating       Coast Guard search and rescue operations and safely directing vessel       traffic at sea,” Hughes said from Comox. “To shut down such vital       services in Comox, in Vancouver and in Tofino and attempt to run them       remotely with cameras and radar is a recipe for maritime disasters.”       ____________________________________________________              October 8, 2013 - Globe and Mail                     Federal pledge to build coast guard ships a good sign for B.C. spill       response, Clark says                     Days after raising concerns about Ottawa's support for marine-spill       response on the B.C. coast, Premier Christy Clark says she is "thankful"       the federal government is committed to doing better.              Ms. Clark offered the supportive comments Tuesday when asked about a       federal plan to spend $3.3-billion on up to 10 Canadian Coast Guard ships.              "For decades, the federal government has been withdrawing support for       Coast Guard on the west coast – the busiest port in this country. For       the first time in decades, we have a federal government that is       interested in fixing that problem," Ms. Clark told reporters following       an unrelated event.              "I am very thankful we have a federal government that seems to be       interested in helping us do that because we can't do it without them."              During an interview with CBC broadcast last weekend, Ms. Clark said the       federal government would not have the resources to deal with a major       spill disaster, noting "we are woefully under-resourced."              Ms. Clark has made "world-leading" marine-spill response one of B.C.'s       five conditions for approving such pipeline projects as Enbridge's       Northern Gateway initiative, which would deliver oil from the Alberta       oil sands to the B.C. coast.              The environment critic for the B.C. New Democrats said Ms. Clark's       comments on Tuesday suggest an inconsistent position.              "The position is as clear as tar sands oil," said Spencer Chandra Herbert.              "She's trying to be both leader of the opposition and premier. One day,       nothing is going well. The next day, everything is going well," he said.              He said he was surprised by her comments. "You don't go on national TV       and say, 'We're woefully under-resourced,' then the next day say,       'Things are going good.' "              Mr. Chandra-Herbert also noted that the new coast-guard ships announced       this week are years away from being built and deployed. The federal       government says the $3.3-billion will allow for up to five multitask       vessels and five offshore patrol vessels. Environmental response would       be among the roles of the ships.              "What if there was a spill tomorrow? Those ships wouldn't be ready; the       province wouldn't be ready; the federal government wouldn't be ready."       ___________________________________________________________              Why should THE OIL COMPANIES be the ones to "be ready" ? Let THEM pay       for any added costs for ensuring no ocean oil spills. Not their cleanup.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca