Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    bc.general    |    British Columbia general chatter    |    24,289 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 23,435 of 24,289    |
|    Cripsie Clark to All    |
|    Employment Program of BC: lntegrated Cas    |
|    19 Mar 14 07:12:48    |
      XPost: can.politics       From: fritz@spamexpire-201403.rodent.frell.theremailer.net              March 18, 2014              Please help us and the clients we serve-BC's under/unemployed.              On April 2,2A!2, the province of BC rolled out its new       Employment Program of BC (EPBC), along with its new database,       the lntegrated Case Management system (lCM). Just before doing       so though, it had all EPBC case managers and contractor staff       sign a gag order, in which we agreed not to discuss the internal       workings of the program (which is why this is being sent to you,       unsigned, via an anonymous server).              (Madam Premier, if ICM is so great, WHY THE GAG ORDER? Are you       worried that the taxpayers may find out how much this software       is costing them in cash and resources?)              While our alleged mandate is to help British Columbians find the       shortest, most direct routeback to sustainable employment, the       effects of working within the EPBC's ever-changing policies and       procedures, along with the ever-increasing administrative burden       of having to try to keep the government's "Quality Assurance"       staff happy in terms of where and how data is entered into the       ICM is seriously impeding our ability to meet the needs of our       clients. Moreover, EPBC contractors are paid on a fee-for-       service basis, which over the past two years has resulted in an       ever increasing pressure on staff to be creative in their       billings and a predominant focus on the part of our employers to       ensure maximum profitability for their agencies, effectively       resulting in the needs of our clients taking a very distant back       seat. (NOTE: Prior to April 2, 2012, case managers were not       responsible for worrying about billings-that was the work of       their employers-and could focus their attentions entirely on       assisting clients with getting back to work, which is, after       all, what we were trained to do.)              The ICM initially came with a reported price tag of       S186,000,000. By early 2013, ongoing revisions to the ICM were       rumoured to have cost British Columbians an additional 5200       million. God knows what the figure is now. Meanwhile, in order       to ensure that case managers and staff are entering data       correctly and in the right "applets," the agencies have had to       hire additional administrative staff to ensure "data compliance"       and, more recently, staff to go through every case manager's       files on an ongoing basis, trying to anticipate and/or meet the       needs of the government's Quality Assurance staff, who also       audit all of our files to ensure every "1" is dotted and every       "t" is crossed. The focus of agency staff meetings is on       billings, the latest changes to EPBC policies and procedures,       Quality Assurance requirements, billings and sustainability for       the agencies and so forth. ln short, BC taxpayers are paying       through the nose and then some, for a system that is seriously       broken and has long since ceased to be driven by the needs of       the clients.              Case managers and staff are burning out and jumping ship at an       ever escalating rate, due to a sincere desire to help our       clients with their employment needs that is increasingly       thwarted at every turn by: the ever changing, ever growing, and       entirely unmanageable administrative burden of the ICM; the       relentless onslaught of ever changing policies and procedures;       the constant changes to in-house policies and procedures that       occur as a result of trying to meet contractual obligations and       the demands of 'Quality Assurance Gone Wild,; the acute and       growing pressure on case managers and staff to maximize billings       and profitability for their employers; and an ever increasing       sense of overwhelm, incompetence and exhaustion in the face of       it all.              Christy Clark and her government may argue that this is all       being done in the name of transparency and accountabilityto the       tax payers of this province, but I can assure you that if the       taxpayers understood what is really going on in this sector and       how much it is costing them, they would be outraged, and rightly       so. Hundreds of millions of dollars are being spent on this       program, but it is certainly NOT making it easier for British       Columbians to get back to work or get the training that they       need to do so.              And for the record, while our business signs, cards, letterheads       and so forth are littered in government logos, the case managers       of this province do not have the benefit of a government wage       nor pensions. We work for private and/or non-profit contractors       who, far too often, have become so preoccupied with their profit       margins that the needs of their clients and staff have come to       take a very distant back seat. lt is no wonder that so many Work       BC case managers are taking stress leaves, seeking jobs with       WorkSafe (for significantly better wages, a pension and no ICM)       or changing careers altogether.              Please help us - there's a huge story here, if only journalists       & the public would pursue it.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca