Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    bc.general    |    British Columbia general chatter    |    24,289 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 23,563 of 24,289    |
|    =?UTF-8?B?IijgsqBf4LKgKSAi?= to All    |
|    Bad news for British Columbians . . . .     |
|    16 Dec 14 18:24:08    |
      XPost: can.politics, bc.politics, van.general       XPost: vic.general       From: Panca@nyet.ca              A $9-billion dam - to supply the electricity and water for foreign companies       that will be extracting our resources.       And she dared say: "Affordable" electricity. How are YOUR hydro bills this       winter, British Columbians?              BC, we just got screwed big time.       _______________________________________________       CBC News Posted: Dec 16, 2014              Site C dam approved by B.C. government       Massive hydro project would flood a large area of the Peace River Valley in       northern B.C.              B.C. has approved the $9 billion Site C dam — a massive hydroelectric project       that would flood a large area of the Peace River Valley in northeastern B.C.              In making the announcement, Premier Christy Clark said the Site C Clean Energy       Project will provide B.C. residents with a reliable source of power for the       next 100 years for the least cost to the taxpayer.               History: Site C dam: How we got here and what you need to know              “Affordable, reliable, clean electricity is the backbone of British       Columbia’s       economy,” said Clark. “Site C will support our quality of life for decades       to       come and will enable continued investment and a growing economy.”                      First Nations, environmentalists, opposed              The Union of B.C. Indian Chiefs is drawing a line in the sand declaring that       Site C "will never see the light of day."              " We believe it to be an incredibly short-sighted and stupid decision, said       Grand Chief Stewart Philip."It's not about the money. It's about the       environment, it's about the land — about constitutional rights, treaty rights       and so on and so forth. It's about a way of life."              Treaty 8 First Nations, some of whom were displaced by the W.A.C Bennett dam       when it was built, say they will fight construction of the Site C project. The       hydroelectric project would dramatically alter a large area of northeastern       B.C. flooding more than 5,500 hectares of land over an 83-kilometre stretch of       valley.              In a letter to the minister, they demand the government repeal the Columbia       River Treaty with the United States, which provides downstream benefits they       say allow the U.S. to receive B.C. power at a fraction of its cost. They also       said B.C. could fill its electrical needs through independent power producers       utilizing renewable solar, wind, water and geothermal energy.              The First Nations Summit, representing a majority of First Nations and Tribal       Councils in B.C., issued a statement denouncing the decision, noting it will       result in extensive flooding within the traditional territories of Treaty 8       nations.              "This approach is unacceptable and an affront to the cultivation of       constructive government-to-government relations between the provincial       government and BC First Nations," it said in a statement.              West Moberly First Nation Chief Roland Willson said his band is not opposed to       resource development, but his people don't want to see the flooding of this       land, which has many sacred sites on it.              "We said no to the destruction of that valley … it's the last chunk of valley       that we have and it's vitally important," he said. "We have to make a decision       here that will have implications for many, many decades."              The Peace Valley Environment Association said B.C. had made the biggest mistake       in its history, noting that with five court cases opposing Site C already under       way, it will cost the government millions in legal fees and years in the courts              "At this time, it would make far more sense for BC to pause and develop an       energy plan for the province. There is no rush to build Site C," it said.              BC Hydro estimates Site C would generate an estimated 1,100 megawatts of       capacity, or enough to power the equivalent of 450,000 homes a year.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca