XPost: can.politics, ab.politics   
   From: Panca@nyet.ca   
      
   > "(?_?) " wrote...   
   >>   
   >> On 11/6/2014 6:15 PM, eric@nil.invalid.com wrote:   
   >>> "(?_?) " wrote...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Eric Schild on an anti-RCMP rant again . . . .   That arrest in Alberta   
   really   
   >>>> made an impression on you, eh, Schild?   
   >>>   
   >>> Another diversion into off-topic personal attacks from 'Karen Gordon'.   
   >   
   >> Yep . . .  I was right . . . . your arrest in Alberta and mention of   
   >> it makes you chafe.   
      
   Eric Schild aka  eric@nil.invalid.com wrote:   
   > OK, so why does mentioning Osoyoos make you 'chafe', 'Gordon'?  You seem   
   > desperate to change the subject.  I've found that mentioning Banff   
   > issues online seems to make the RCMP and the Alberta gov't 'chafe'.   
   >   
   > Right now there is a matter before BC courts regarding one of the worst   
   > mass murders in Canadian history - the 'Surrey Six' case.  The problem   
   > is that lawyers for the two convicts are arguing that the idea that a   
   > number of RCMP investigators in the case apparently spent a good deal of   
   > time with their pants around their ankles fucking the witnesses makes   
   > the conviction moot.   
   >   
   > My take is that the Crown is arguing that because this is such a serious   
   > case the judge should ignore the witness tamping - er... tampering.   
   > This almost seems like an act of desperation, as legally speaking the   
   > reverse ought to be true.  There wasn't ever any testimony given that   
   > the officers in question needed to probe the vaginas of the witnesses   
   > with their penises as part of the investigation, IIRC.   
   >   
   > "The court should uphold murder convictions against two men in the   
   > Surrey Six gang case, says the Crown, arguing it would be 'grossly   
   > disproportionate' to toss verdicts 'for one of the biggest crimes of the   
   > century' due to allegations of sexual misconduct involving four   
   > investigating officers and potential witnesses."   
   >   
   > http://tinyurl.com/lubaey3 (Globe & Mail)   
   >   
   > So what is your opinion of the case, 'Gordon'?   
      
      
   I think it confirms what I said about you hating the RCMP, Schild.   
   ¯\_(ツ)_/¯   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)