home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   bc.politics      BC is nice but full of liberal fucktards      114,372 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 112,676 of 114,372   
   The Doctor to Oneflewoverthecuckonest@sanity.com   
   Re: STILL no regulations for oil industr   
   12 Dec 14 21:06:28   
   
   XPost: can.politics, ab.politics, edm.general   
   XPost: calgary.general   
   From: doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca   
      
   In article ,   
   Barry Bruyea   wrote:   
   >On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 16:22:42 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >>On 2014-12-12, Barry Bruyea  wrote:   
   >>> On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 21:20:29 +0000 (UTC), doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca   
   >>> (The Doctor) wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>In article <3apj8apdf6k6ntd84763n4r0ohill4ss8b@4ax.com>,   
   >>>>Barry Bruyea   wrote:   
   >>>>>On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 13:49:42 +0000 (UTC), doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca   
   >>>>>(The Doctor) wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>In article ,   
   >>>>>>Barry Bruyea   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 23:46:11 +0000 (UTC), doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca   
   >>>>>>>(The Doctor) wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>In article ,   
   >>>>>>>>Barry Bruyea   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 17:26:01 +0000 (UTC), doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca   
   >>>>>>>>>(The Doctor) wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>In article ,   
   >>>>>>>>>>Barry Bruyea   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:41:38 +0000 (UTC), doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca   
   >>>>>>>>>>>(The Doctor) wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>In article ,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>=?UTF-8?B?IijgsqBf4LKgKSAi?=   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>December 9, 2014 - Macleans   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>Harper and the oil patch: Honesty is the only policy   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>The prime minister explains crazy policy to us   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>Prime Minister Stephen Harper, today in the House of Commons:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>     ???Frankly, Mr. Speaker, under the current circumstances of   
   the oil and gas   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>sector, it would be crazy, it would be crazy economic policy to   
   do unilateral   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>penalties on that sector. We???re clearly not going to do   
   that,??? Harper told the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>House as Conservative MPs roared their approval.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>     ???In fact, nobody in the world is regulating their oil and   
   gas sector. I???d   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>be delighted if they did. Canada will be there with them.???   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>Jim Prentice, then federal minister of the environment, not quite   
   five years ago:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>     ???For those of you who doubt that the government of Canada   
   lacks either the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>willingness or the authority to protect our national interests as   
   a ???clean   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>energy superpower,??? think again,??? he warned darkly. ???We do   
   and we will. And, in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>our efforts, we will expect and we will secure the co-operation   
   of those   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>private interests which are developing the oil sands. Consider it   
   a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>responsibility that accompanies the right to develop these   
   valuable Canadian   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>resources.???   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>Back then, it was possible to believe the federal government   
   would impose   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>regulations on the oil and gas industries. The government   
   certainly said it   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>would, often enough. (Peter Kent in February, 2013: ???We are now   
   well into, and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>very close to finalizing, regulations for the oil and gas   
   sector.???) But, as   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>Chris Turner reminds us in his book The War on Science, Prentice   
   quit as   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>environment minister in November 2010, and the Harper   
   government???s periodic   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>attempts to demonstrate environmental virtue, even at some   
   hypothetical cost to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>the resource sector, pretty much came to an end.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>Of course, it can be hard to tell where the notion of oil and gas   
   regulations   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>ended. Prentice himself has been sounding much like Harper since   
   he became   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>premier of Alberta:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>     ???Environmental performance is important, but so, too, is   
   our industrial   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>competitiveness . . . I think this low-price environment is a   
   reminder . . .   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>that we have to be careful laying on costs, including regulatory   
   costs, on our   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>industry, because we need to remain competitive.???   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>But is even that new? From my 2010 article, linked above:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>     ???We will only adopt a cap-and-trade regime if the United   
   States signals   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>that it wants to do the same. Our position on harmonization   
   applies equally to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>regulation. Canada can go down either road???cap and trade or   
   regulation???but we   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>will go down neither road alone.???   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>So the paper trail on the government???s oil and gas policy is a   
   bit of a mess.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>The feds will only impose regulations in concert with the   
   Americans? Well,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>there are two problems with that story. First, as Bruce Cheadle   
   points out:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>     An Environment Canada briefing memo revealed last month by   
   the Globe and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>Mail shows that the United States, in fact, placed what were   
   called   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>???significant??? limits on its oil and gas sector in 2012.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>     ???For oil and gas, recent air pollution regulations are   
   expected to result   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>in significant greenhouse-gas reduction co-benefits, comparable   
   to the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>reductions that would result from the approach being developed   
   for this sector   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>in Canada,??? states the June 2013 memo obtained by Greenpeace   
   under an Access to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>Information request.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>Second, there is simply no record of a concerted Canadian effort   
   to work with   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>the Americans on joint regulations. Foreign Affairs Minister John   
   Baird   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>mentions the Keystone pipeline to U.S. Secretary of State John   
   Kerry in every   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>meeting and at every phone call. There is literally no record of   
   any public   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>proposal from Harper to U.S. President Barack Obama to work on   
   the joint   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>regulations that are now, the PM says, the necessary condition of   
   any Canadian   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>regulations.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>In this light, I note with genuine surprise that the   
   ???U.S.-Canada clean energy   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>dialogue??? that was created when Obama visited Ottawa in 2009 is   
   actually still   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>a thing. I also note with no surprise at all that the latest   
   joint report,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>barely a month old, does not mention joint regulations on oil and   
   gas   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>industries anywhere in its 10 pages.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca