XPost: ab.politics, can.politics, ont.politics   
   From: none@present.com   
      
   "Alan Baker"  wrote in message news:mcj3m8$829$1@news.datemas.de...   
      
   > On 2015-02-24 23:31:19 +0000, spamnemesis said:   
      
   > > "M.I.Wakefield"  wrote in message news:mchvhl$6mg$1@dont-email.me...   
   > >> Which is what the Saudi's wanted.  How soon after gas gets back to   
   > >> $1.20 will it be before she starts whining about gas prices being so   
   > >> high, when there's all that oil in Alberta?   
   > >   
   > > That's Canadian oil in Alberta.  Not Albertan oil.   
      
   Excerpt from The Constitution Act, 1867   
      
   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~   
   92A.    (1) In each province, the legislature may exclusively make laws in   
   relation to   
       (a)    exploration for non-renewable natural resources in the province;   
       (b)    development, conservation and management of non-renewable natural   
   resources and forestry resources in the province, including laws in relation   
   to the rate of primary production therefrom;   
   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~   
      
   So, wrong.  Again.   
      
   > So would you say the same about all natural resources?   
      
      
      
   > > Time to kickstart the 'Buy Canadian' policy for this country.  It's   
   > > certainly been a boost for Obama's U.S.A.   
      
   You don't seem to want Alberta to sell their oil to anyone.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)