Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    bc.politics    |    BC is nice but full of liberal fucktards    |    114,373 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 113,472 of 114,373    |
|    "don't export to All    |
|    Rachel Notley - offers carrots, not stic    |
|    01 Feb 16 17:21:32    |
      She's a very smart lady . . . she's enticing the oil industry to switch their       focus from extraction of oil and gas for export to manufacture of goods. And       what corporation doesn't like 'royalty credits' where they had to pay       royalties before?              This could well be the way to turn around other polluting, exporting,       subsidy-gobbling industries that have no future in coming decades. And       imagine if Alberta finally weans itself off extraction of dirty oil and starts       to contribute to the Canadian        economy, instead of to shareholders' profits.       ___________________________________________       Canadian Press | Feb 1, 2016              Alberta aims to diversify beyond energy extraction with new program              CALGARY - The Alberta government aims to create thousands of jobs and reel in       billions in investment by providing $500 million in royalty credits to the       province's petrochemical sector.              The Petrochemicals Diversification Program announced Monday is one example of       how the NDP government aims to encourage more value-added processing in       Alberta -- turning raw materials into more lucrative products within the       province rather than shipping        them elsewhere.              "We understand that to create long-term sustainable jobs, we need to diversify       beyond just energy extraction into other areas of strength," said Economic       Development and Trade Minister Deron Bilous.              Alberta's petrochemical industry has a tough time competing with Texas and       Louisiana because of higher construction costs, he said. The program seeks to       narrow that gap and attract investment.              The initiative will focus on two types of natural gas: methane and propane,       which can be used in the manufacturing of fertilizers, plastics and other       products.              The government said it expects 3,000 jobs during construction and 1,000       directly and indirectly once plants start up. It said there's the potential       for two or three new facilities to be built in Alberta and investment of       between $3 billion and $5        billion.              Ed Gibbons, who chairs Alberta's Industrial Heartland Association, said the       program is good news for the Edmonton area, which is home to numerous       petrochemical plants and refineries.              "We anticipate that today's announcement will provide the tipping point for       investors with the scale now pointing toward Albertans' direction," said       Gibbons, an Edmonton city councillor.              The credits will be paid out over three years once the projects are complete       in an effort to reduce risk to government. The idea is for the petrochemical       companies to trade or sell the credits to oil and natural gas producers, which       can use them to        offset their royalty payments to the province.              One recommendation from last week's royalty review report was to examine ways       to encourage more investment in facilities that turn raw resources into more       valuable products. In addition to natural gas, the expert panel also       recommended looking at ways        to make higher-value products out of oilsands bitumen.              The application process for the program opens this week and will close in       April. Bilous said shovels could hit the ground this year.              University of Calgary economist Trevor Tombe said there are times when       government subsidies are justifiable -- but this isn't one of them.              "If a facility is not able to compete in the market on its own grounds, then       -- absent a market failure _ a subsidy will actually lower GDP," he said. "It       will actually harm the economy."              At a time when the province is contending with a hefty budget deficit, it's a       questionable spending choice, Tombe said.              "Things like child care or education, health care, homelessness support --       these are areas where subsidies can be justifiable on social policy grounds.        Dollars spent on the petrochemical industry means those are dollars that can't       be spent in other        valuable areas."                     http://ipolitics.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/CP-oilsands-image.jpg              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca