Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    bc.politics    |    BC is nice but full of liberal fucktards    |    114,373 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 113,473 of 114,373    |
|    too bad, Christy to All    |
|    =?UTF-8?B?QW5kIHN0aWxsIGFub3RoZXIgTE5HIH    |
|    06 Feb 16 17:49:05    |
      From: brewnoser2@gmail.com              VANCOUVER SUN - February 4, 2016                     Clark to face B.C. election without LNG dollars                       OTTAWA -- One of B.C.'s top liquefied natural gas projects has been delayed, a       blow to Premier Christy Clark's ambitious LNG dream that has left her planning       for the next election without LNG revenue.              Royal Dutch Shell announced Thursday it is "postponing" a final decision on       the $50-billion LNG Canada project in Kitimat.              LNG Canada had been one of the Clark's highest hopes to proceed before the       2017 provincial election because it already has federal and environmental       approvals.              Instead, Finance Minister Mike de Jong said he will table a budget later this       month that estimates no revenue from any LNG facilities until 2018-19.              Clark had campaigned in 2013 on a promise of a "debt-free B.C.," with a       $100-billion LNG prosperity fund from an industry expected to generate 100,000       jobs. Three years later, no companies have started construction, leaving       Clark's initial timeline of        a small LNG export facility by 2016 and three more by 2020 unlikely to be met.              Yet the premier continued to voice confidence in the industry Thursday.              She seized on a note in Shell's package to investors and media indicating that       a "final investment decision" on the Kitimat-based project has been postponed       only from April to December of this year.              "To me the good news in that, when you see energy projects getting cancelled       all over the world, and you see producers cutting their capital investment in       Alberta, in countries across the globe, (LNG Canada) announced that they       re-committing to the        project in British Columbia," she told reporters in Ottawa. "The date's       changed but their commitment to it hasn't, and you see that they've put it in       writing."              Shell Chief Executive Officer Ben van Beurden, in a statement to Shell       shareholders, didn't mention the new target date but revealed the company       suffered an 80-per-cent plunge in profits in 2015.       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^              Royal Dutch Shell assured investors that it is responding to the turmoil in       energy markets by slashing billions of dollars in spending, reducing its       global workforce by 10,000, and among other measures "postponing final       investment decisions on LNG Canada.       "              Royal Dutch Shell holds the controlling interest in LNG Canada, along with       PetroChina, Mitsubishi, and KOGAS. They are working in partnership with the       Haisla First Nation to construct the LNG project, including a plant and       terminal in Kitimat, at a cost        of up to $50 billion.              LNG Canada spokeswoman Katharine Birtwistle issued a statement after Royal       Dutch Shell's announcement saying "we are still very much on track" to make a       decision in late 2016.              LNG Canada chief executive Andy Calitz, who was part of Clark's delegation to       Ottawa, confirmed that all four partners have decided they "want to remain in       the project," but are delaying their final decision.              He later noted that the project's "fundamentals" -- a proximity to Asian       markets, a 40-year licence, and an attractive fiscal regime -- remain positive       when compared to       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ !!       competing LNG projects in areas like the Gulf of Mexico and Africa.              "The turmoil cannot last forever. We will come through that. The       fundamentals (of the project) are really sound."              LNG analysts said Shell's delay was not a surprise, and any new date projected       for a final investment decision would only matter if market conditions       improved.              "Look at the commodity prices and everything else, I don't think anybody       should be surprised the decision is pushed out a little bit," said Dirk Lever,       managing director of institutional equity research at AltaCorp Capital Inc.        "To make a final        investment decision, they are probably having to rerun some numbers and so       some other work. So I'm not surprised at all."              Lever said the comments from Shell's CEO are more illuminating than the       subsequent reaction from LNG Canada's project press office, which insisted the       project remains on track.              Vancouver energy lawyer David Austin said it's unlikely any LNG project will       proceed until all regulatory approvals are in place, banks are willing to lend       money and there are buyers lined up to purchase the LNG product.              "Market alignment is not the same as political dreams," he said. The market       is "in turmoil" and it's very difficult to see final investment decisions by       LNG companies until things improve, he said.              The Shell setback landed smack in the middle of what was an otherwise good day       for the premier, who is leading what some believe might be the largest       provincial delegation to Ottawa in the nation's history.              Clark, who will meet with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau Friday, was joined by       four cabinet ministers and more than 100 senior representatives from the B.C.       business community, as well as people from academia, the labour movement and       First Nations.              She said the feedback from Trudeau's ministers is that Ottawa is strongly       supportive of B.C.'s top two priorities -- LNG and new softwood lumber accord       with the U.S.              Clark said the federal government's new interim federal policy on       environmental reviews won't be a problem for the LNG sector, even though the       new system will add additional requirements to consult First Nations and take       broader greenhouse gas emissions        into consideration.              "That's okay, because we know that we're creating the cleanest LNG in the       world."        [anyone who buys that will get a free LNG tour] (=_=)              She noted that Ottawa has promised that the new process won't add further       delays to B.C.'s LNG sector, a key message for Petronas given that it's Prince       Rupert-area project has been stalled in a federal environmental review.       [snip]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca