XPost: can.politics, alt.tv.networks.cbc   
   From: .m@nsn.s   
      
   On 2016-10-20 6:28 PM, Alan Baker wrote:   
   > On 2016-10-20 3:18 PM, Silver Slimer wrote:   
   >> On 2016-10-20 5:33 PM, Alan Baker wrote:   
   >>> On 2016-10-20 2:29 PM, Silver Slimer wrote:   
   >>>> On 2016-10-20 5:25 PM, Alan Baker wrote:   
   >>>>> On 2016-10-20 2:14 PM, Silver Slimer wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 2016-10-20 4:55 PM, Alan Baker wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On 2016-10-20 6:46 AM, Silver Slimer wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On 2016-10-19 9:05 PM, Alan Baker wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> On 2016-10-19 6:00 PM, Silver Slimer wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> On 2016-10-19 8:42 PM, Alan Baker wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On 2016-10-19 5:39 PM, Silver Slimer wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2016-10-19 8:20 PM, Alan Baker wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2016-10-19 5:11 PM, Deplorable Silver Slimer wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2016-10-19 7:06 PM, Alan Baker wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < snip >   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> " In the tapes, from over 30 years ago, Clinton   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> describes how   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> she was   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> able to find a loophole in the system to discredit the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evidence   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> against   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> her client. She is heard laughing as she describes the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tactics   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> she   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to do so."   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Except that wasn't when she laughed in the recording you   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> provided.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't write that article, idiot. I only chose it   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because I   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> braindead liberals like you only believe liberal sources   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feed   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> washed brains.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You did provide the earlier YouTube link as your support for   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'She knew her client was guilty and laughed about the fact   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> he had   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> passed a lie detector test because it was clear that he had   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> done   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it. '   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Except all it was was a brief self-deprecating laugh at her   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> own   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> naivety.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brilliant. The fact remains that a man who raped a 12   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> year-old   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> girl   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ended up serving little to no time after traumatizing her for   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> life   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> as a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> result of HilLIARy deciding to tamper with evidence the way   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> she   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> did   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> but it's all OK because she was self-deprecating. You   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> liberals   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> have no   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> morals whatsoever.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> You still have no proof at all that Clinton tampered with   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> anything.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> I guess you'll have to read the long articles which speak on   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> subject. Be my guest and look them up.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> < snip >   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Having nothing... ..you run like the little coward you are.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> :-)   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> No, I just think that the fact that you spend your entire day on   
   >>>>>>>>>> Usenet,   
   >>>>>>>>>> in at least two newsgroups no less, is very unhealthy and am   
   >>>>>>>>>> encouraging   
   >>>>>>>>>> you to do something else. This was reported very well and the   
   >>>>>>>>>> fact   
   >>>>>>>>>> that   
   >>>>>>>>>> you haven't seen any of it shows that you rely only on very   
   >>>>>>>>>> subjective   
   >>>>>>>>>> sources.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> If it was reported so very well...   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> ...why have you spent more effort avoiding providing the support   
   >>>>>>>>> you've   
   >>>>>>>>> just claimed would be so easy to provide than you would have   
   >>>>>>>>> simply   
   >>>>>>>>> providing it?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Because it is not my job to educate you. I bring up the facts and   
   >>>>>>>> it's   
   >>>>>>>> your job to look them up if you don't believe me. You have no   
   >>>>>>>> moral,   
   >>>>>>>> intellectual or other authority here.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> It's your job to support your claims...   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> ...only you can't, can you?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> I don't respect you, so I don't feel any particular need to make you   
   >>>>>> happy.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> It wouldn't make me happy, though.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> You failing makes me happy.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> People who fail at life use Apple products and you're a Mac advocate.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> LOL!   
   >>>   
   >>> I win!   
   >>   
   >> Whatever rocks your miserable little boat, Baked Anus.   
   >>   
   >   
   > Any time you have to slip into ad hominem attacks, you lose.   
      
   I don't really care how you perceive things, Baked Anus. If you feel   
   like being delusional and claiming victory, go right ahead; none of your   
   posts suggest that you are right in the head.   
      
   --   
   Silver Slimer   
   Islam is a disease   
   Gab.ai: @silverslimer   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)