Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 8142  |
|  Michiel van der Vlist to Carlos Navarro  |
|  non-CM nodes  |
|  20 Sep 22 21:49:13  |
 TID: FMail-W32 2.1.3.7-B20170919 RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes TZUTC: 0200 CHRS: CP850 2 MSGID: 2:280/5555 632a1b3c REPLY: 2:341/234.1 63294cce Hello Carlos, On Monday September 19 2022 21:28, you wrote to Wilfred van Velzen: WV>> I think non-CM in combination with IBN, most of the time is an WV>> error in the nodelist. I never found a non-CM + IBN node that was WV>> actually just connectable at ZMH. And it doesn't make sense WV>> either. CN> A non-CM node doesn't have to be a ZMH-only node. As you know, it can CN> carry the ,Tyz flag. A sysop may not want or need to have her system CN> running 24 hours a day, for whatever reason. Theoretically that is possible and a non CM binkp node is not against the rules. But it is against common sense. Binkp connectibility requires an internet connection and these days internet connetions are up 24/7. It takes EFFORT to configure a binkp system for non CM operation, it strongy reduces connectivity and there are no benefits that I can see. Cheers, Michiel --- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20170303 * Origin: http://www.vlist.eu (2:280/5555) SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/0 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 114/705 709 120/340 SEEN-BY: 123/120 131 124/5016 129/305 331 153/757 7715 154/10 203/0 SEEN-BY: 218/700 840 220/70 221/0 6 226/17 227/114 229/110 111 112 SEEN-BY: 229/113 200 206 275 317 424 426 428 470 550 664 700 240/5832 SEEN-BY: 250/5 8 266/512 267/800 280/464 5003 5555 282/1038 292/854 SEEN-BY: 292/8125 298/25 301/1 305/3 310/31 317/3 320/219 322/757 SEEN-BY: 341/66 234 342/200 396/45 423/120 460/58 633/280 712/848 SEEN-BY: 770/1 100 340 772/210 220 230 2452/250 5019/40 5020/1042 SEEN-BY: 5053/58 PATH: 280/5555 464 770/1 317/3 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]