Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 8634  |
|  Rick Smith to Michael Dukelsky  |
|  occasional error  |
|  19 Mar 24 06:53:24  |
 REPLY: 2:5020/1042 65f93be2 MSGID: 1:105/10 65f99942 CHRS: UTF-8 2 TZUTC: -0700 Greetings Michael! Tuesday March 19 2024 10:16, you wrote to me about an urgent matter!: MD> * Forwarded from area 'BINKD' MD> Hello Rick, MD> Monday March 18 2024, Rick Smith wrote to Michael Dukelsky: RS>>>> I am wondering if anyone knows why this happens? Its not all RS>>>> the time but the same node always? It has a node statement, RS>>>> address correct etc... RS>> It does lead me to another ? tho. I had a nodestatement for that RS>> node that just had wh2bbs.us but binkd was trying bbs.wh2bbs.us? RS>> So it makes me wonder if I had a node statement in binkd.cfg why RS>> did it use the nodelist instead of that node statement? MD> Do you use nodelist.pl in your binkd.cfg? Or maybe you have a MD> different binkd.cfg with bbs.wh2bbs.us in it and sometimes you start MD> binkd with that binkd.cfg? Try to find the second configuration: I do use binkd style nodelist so in my binkd.cfg I have all of my node statements and after the node statements I have an include for the nodelist. So does binkd read the nodelist before the node statements? ---- Regards, Rick Smith (Nitro) ... Sleep... The thing "some" SysOps go without, cuz BBSing is too fun;-) --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20180707 * Origin: ----> Abacus BBS! --->>>>bbs.abon.us:2323 (1:105/10) SEEN-BY: 15/0 90/1 105/7 10 11 44 81 85 500 106/201 128/260 129/305 SEEN-BY: 135/225 153/7715 218/700 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 113 200 SEEN-BY: 229/206 275 307 317 426 428 470 550 664 700 266/512 282/1038 SEEN-BY: 291/111 292/854 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45 633/280 712/848 PATH: 105/10 81 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]