Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    ca.general    |    California general chatter    |    8,950 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 7,468 of 8,950    |
|    Harvey M. to All    |
|    President Suck Me Off actually was a "te    |
|    01 Jun 14 23:02:49    |
      XPost: alt.california, ba.politics, alt.gossip.celebrities       XPost: rec.arts.tv       From: peederphiles@sfmayor.org              The irrepressible Donald Trump has raised still another question       the major media have dared not to ask: Did Barack Obama qualify       for Columbia and Harvard on his own accomplishments?              “How does a bad student go to Columbia and then to Harvard?”       asked Trump of the Associated Press. “I’m thinking about it, I’m       certainly looking into it. Let him show his records.”              Trump asks a very good question for which the anti-journalists       of the major media have no good answer. So allow me to fill in       the gaps.              Although the late New York politico Percy Sutton admitted to       helping Obama get into Harvard Law, Obama likely could have       gotten in on his own.              Obama had the one thing it took all along, and he surely began       to understand this when, as a bench-warming, B-minus student at       his Hawaiian prep school, he “won” a full scholarship to       Occidental where he spent his first two years of college.              New Yorker editor David Remnick has chosen not to see what       greased Obama’s skids despite adding considerable information       about Obama’s academic record in his Obama biography, “The       Bridge.”              Remnick tells us that Obama was an “unspectacular” student in       his final two years at Columbia and at every stop before that       going back to grade school.              A Northwestern University prof who wrote a letter of reference       for Obama reinforces the point, telling Remnick, “I don’t think       [Obama] did too well in college.”              How such an indifferent student got into a law school whose       applicants’ LSAT scores typically track between 98 to 99       percentile and whose GPAs range between 3.8 and 4.0 is a subject       Remnick bypasses.              Obama had decided on law school as a way to follow in the career       path of the recently deceased Chicago mayor, Harold Washington.       Washington went to Northwestern’s very respectable law school in       Chicago. The thought doesn’t cross Obama’s mind.              In “Dreams from My Father,” he limits his choices to “Harvard,       Yale, Stanford.” Writes Obama biographer David Mendell as       casually as if the honor were deserved, “Obama would soon be       accepted at the most prestigious law school in the nation.”              As to Obama’s LSAT scores, Jimmy Hoffa’s body will be unearthed       before those are.              Michelle Obama’s experience shows just how wonderfully       accessible Harvard Law School could be. “Told by counselors that       her SAT scores and her grades weren’t good enough for an Ivy       League school,” writes biographer Christopher Andersen,       “Michelle applied to Princeton and Harvard anyway.”              Jack Cashill’s literary investigation uncovers revelations       galore about Obama’s alleged life narrative. Order the new book       “Deconstructing Obama: The Life, Love and Letters of America’s       First Post-Modern President”              Sympathetic biographer Liza Mundy writes, “Michelle frequently       deplores the modern reliance on test scores, describing herself       as a person who did not test well.” She did not write well,       either. Mundy charitably describes her senior thesis at       Princeton as “dense and turgid.”              The less charitable Christopher Hitchens observes, “To describe       [the thesis] as hard to read would be a mistake; the thesis       cannot be ‘read’ at all, in the strict sense of the verb. This       is because it wasn’t written in any known language.”              Still, Michelle was admitted to and graduated from Harvard Law.       She had to have been as anxious as Bart Simpson at Genius       School, but Bart at least knew he was in over his head, and he       knew why: He had cheated on his IQ test.              Obama was sufficiently self-deluding – some would say       narcissistic – that he felt little of that anxiety. Later in his       book, Remnick lets slip into the record a revealing letter Obama       had written while president of the Harvard Law Review.              Remnick attempts here to illustrate Obama’s maturity on matters       racial. In the process, however, he suggests one explanation for       how Obama got into Harvard and how he became an editor of the       Harvard Law Review (HLR). Wrote Obama to the Harvard Law Record:              I must say, however, that as someone who has undoubtedly       benefited from affirmative action programs during my academic       career, and as someone who may have benefited from the Law       Review’s affirmative action policy when I was selected to join       the Review last year, I have not felt stigmatized within the       broader law school community or as a staff member of the Review.              Remnick refuses to concede Obama’s need for affirmative action,       let alone any stigma attached to it. He boasts that this “inner       sanctum of the establishment” accepted only the “brightest and       most ambitious” first-year students and offers as explanation,       “Obama’s grades were good.”              As he does on many occasions, Remnick chooses not to share with       the reader a larger truth. The fact is that Obama did not make       the Law Review the old-fashioned way, the way HLR’s first black       editor, Charles Houston, did 70 years prior.              To Obama’s good fortune, the HLR had replaced a meritocracy in       which editors were elected based on grades – the president being       the student with the highest academic rank – with one in which       half the editors were chosen through a writing competition.              This competition, the New York Times reported in 1990, was       “meant to help insure that minority students became editors of       the Law Review.”              The election for president of the Harvard Law Review was based       more on popularity than competence. Obama prevailed over 18       other candidates only after the HLR’s small conservative faction       threw him its support.              Once elected, Obama contributed not one signed word to the HLR       or any other law journal. As Matthew Franck has pointed out in       National Review Online, “A search of the HeinOnline database of       law journals turns up exactly nothing credited to Obama in any       law review anywhere at any time.”              In calling Obama a “terrible student,” Trump speaks a bit       harshly, but not overly so. By Harvard Law standards, Obama was       a terrible student prior to admission. Following graduation, he       contributed nothing to legal scholarship.              Obama graduated magna cum laude from Harvard Law, but that was       surely as much due to charm as it was to performance.              Remember that Michelle, who both wrote and tested poorly, also       graduated from Harvard Law.                             --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca