Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    ca.general    |    California general chatter    |    8,950 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 8,537 of 8,950    |
|    Intelligent Party to All    |
|    Maybe Someone Meant "Invasion," And Not     |
|    07 Mar 21 16:05:57    |
      XPost: sac.politics, alt.california, ca.politics       XPost: ny.politics, nyc.politics       From: Intelligent@savetheworldmsn.com              Maybe someone meant to say "invasion," and not "insurrection."                     According to the dictionary, it looks like the "act" has to be violent. If       some       violence occurred, is not an excuse to stereotype the 99% who did not support       such       violence. Only that one person, then, would be involved in an "insurrection."              It wasn't an insurrection, whether someone meant to say insurrection or not.        If       they did mean to say insurrection, they're a liar, or in grave error. That lie       persists in the Media today.              Thought precedes action. Good thought precedes good action. Bad though       precedes       bad action. That it was an "insurrection," is a thought; preceding police       action.              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca