home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   ca.general      California general chatter      8,950 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 8,549 of 8,950   
   Guy to All   
   Pedophilia is Legal - Just Saying   
   28 Mar 21 14:52:39   
   
   XPost: sac.politics, alt.california, ca.politics   
   XPost: ny.politics, nyc.politics   
   From: Guy@bigsky.com   
      
   Pedophilia is Legal - Just Saying   
      
   One can't rightly have sex with an unwillful prisoner, nor a mentally   
   incompetent   
   toddler.  And then it's that one took somebody's kids skydiving, without their   
   knowledge, but it's really the kid's personal choice.   
      
   A child's right to sexuality is as sacrosanct as a child's right to Church.  It   
   would more, at most be, that one couldn't hang out with them anymore, as far as   
   this warden-ward Parental tyranny is allowed to persist.   
      
   Pedophilia is less deviant than gay or beast.  Pedophilia is akin to   
   interracial.   
   When you prohibit something you give someone a complex.   
      
   People who harm the weakest among us incite the most outrage.  If you were   
   going   
   to take vengeance, you would start with those who torture puppies and children.   
   But it wouldn't undo the evil done.  Yet at the same time, much of the   
   persecution   
   of pedophiles is reminiscent of the persecution of homosexuals, and even   
   interracial sexuality.  There are still people to this day, who say that   
   homosexuals are psychopaths, and have a mental disorder.  They make the same   
   claims about pedophiles.  That some homosexuals are psychos in fact, that some   
   pedophiles have murdered children, that some adult heterosexual men, want to   
   have   
   sex with dead girls, is no acceptable stereotype of 90%-99%+ of the rest of the   
   population.  Whatever percent that is.  For the rest of the people who have no   
   such interest, and it is certainly far above 90%.  Most people respect human   
   rights, yet not those who persecute pedophiles, homosexuals, and black men who   
   just 50 years ago, they hung from a tree for having sex with a white woman.   
      
   For the record we fully condemn child abuse.  And in the strongest terms   
   possible.   
     In case anyone is wondering.   
      
   But there is nothing more criminal about having or distributing pictures and   
   videos of children having sex, than there is about having or distributing   
   nonsexual pictures and videos of children abused, which they distribute on the   
   nightly news and on Youtube both, as evidence of a crime.   
      
   Rather child porn laws are suppressing just such evidence of a crime.  I have   
   heard from law enforcement, that in addition to happy consent child sex videos,   
   there are toddler rape videos.  Toddlers screaming for their mothers, evidence   
   of   
   a crime hidden from the public eye.  This is the greatest atrocity, an   
   abominable   
   offense to suppress activity that ought to see the light of day, as all   
   evidence   
   of crime ought not be shrouded in darkness.   
      
   You don't have to be pedo, or homo, or have sex with other races.  You're just   
   not   
   against people who do; so long as no one is victimized.  We're not guilty by   
   doctrine.  But those persecuting others by doctrine, are guilty, by fact.   
   Actually   
   two wrongs don't make a right, any more than three do.  But truth and error   
   exist   
   as scientific moral facts.   
      
   On the other hand, according to all just and right legal theory, you don't   
   have to   
   be interage prejudice either.  It's like someone saying you can't have sex with   
   someone from Canada, and threatening to kill you if you do.  Then you say   
   people   
   who have sex with Canadians have a mental disorder.  It's not like every   
   interracial couple is a fetish couple.  Prejudice is abhorrent.   
      
   But the right points of criticism against pedophiles, are: 1) You can't have   
   sex   
   with an unwillful prisoner, any more than a police officer can tell someone to   
   have sex with them, and do so, and 2) You can't have sex with a mentally   
   incompetent toddler.   
      
   And then it's that one took somebody's kids skydiving without their knowledge,   
   but   
   it's really the kid's personal choice.   
      
   ---------------------   
   So I was trying to figure out, if like the person said "yes" to the prison   
   guard,   
   would the prison guard still be in jeopardy if the person later said, they just   
   said "yes" cause they were afraid.  Yet the law, "de jure," does not even admit   
   the possibility of consent, which is a fact, but says the act is criminal "per   
   se," which makes the law criminal.   
      
   Saying children can't consent *is* a lie.   
      
   I'm not a pedophile.  I just don't like to see my innocent countrymen murdered.   
      
   People saying minors can't consent, are making the same mistake as people   
   saying   
   minors have to consent; and people saying minors have to consent, are making   
   the   
   same mistake, as people saying minors can't consent.  Both persuasions are   
   abhorrent.  Both parties need to be corrected.  Because someone had sex in the   
   past, doesn't mean they wish to repeat it today.  Minors are liable to be slut   
   shamed and pressured into blaming their partners, and slut shaming is wrong.    
   This   
   doesn't excuse actual tyrannical influence of a warden-ward relationship. And   
   obviously mentally incompetent toddlers cannot consent.   
      
   And then it's that one took somebody's kids skydiving without their knowledge,   
   but   
   it's really the kid's personal choice, and sacrosanct right, as it is the kid's   
   sacrosanct right to go to Church.  Many teens meet the other kid's dad before   
   taking their sexual/romantic interests out on a date.  But at the moment,   
   apparently the law wouldn't care if pedos had their young friend's parent's   
   blessings.  Again, warden-ward tyranny aside.  Kids in child porn deserve their   
   pay as much as movies stars and kids in underwear commercials.   
      
   No, I'm not making child porn.  No, I'm not a pedo.  In fact, I've never even   
   seen   
   it, and have just heard reports from law enforcement, about toddlers screaming   
   for   
   their mothers while being raped.   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca