Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    ca.general    |    California general chatter    |    8,950 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 8,618 of 8,950    |
|    Intelligent Party to Intelligent Party    |
|    Bump    |
|    21 Oct 21 13:47:40    |
      XPost: sac.politics, alt.california, ca.politics       XPost: ny.politics, nyc.politics       From: Intelligent@savetheworldmsn.com              On 6/26/2021 12:57 PM, Intelligent Party wrote:       > Re: COVID - It's Your Right To Congregation Is Preeminent, And That Involves       > Assembly, Church, The Capitol Demonstration And Public Property       >       >       > It's not like you have freedom of Assembly except as prescribed by law.       >       > It's not like the Constitution is just saying your right to freedom of       speech and       > your right to bear arms are just a good idea.       >       > The Constitution is saying you are right, you are legal, and they are wrong,       and       > they are illegal, if they prohibit you.       >       > Yes, you have a right Thanksgiving Dinner too.       >       > So you fucking monkeys are just going to commit ridiculous acts, and spread       COVID,       > and not be on your own recognizances, like people recycle and stand in line       > without being controlled and coerced to?       >       > Regulation of commerce - employee and consumer protections, has merit, and       is the       > way to control. This also includes product labeling/marketing/advertising       > control, quality control, and perhaps product bundling. It doesn't include       > prohibition when there's not a substitute product.       >       > So do you think you monkeys would be able to only associate only with       intimate,       > repetitive, friends and relatives, during COVID, and not throw the gala       wedding       > party even if it wasn't commercially provided.       >       > The stupidest thing would be to be in a room with someone you're not going       to talk       > to, for non-essential activities.       >       > But isn't all valid work essential!? What are we doing it for otherwise?       >       > Whenever someone speaks to you, they're spewing tiny specks of spit in your       face.       >       >       > Who has to perfect the law? The person with the valid social grievance, or       the       > person with the valid liberty?              Bump              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca