home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   calgary.general      A very nice Canuck city, no libtard BS      176,774 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 174,816 of 176,774   
   spamzone.org to Barry Bruyea   
   Re: Why police kicked in doors - High Ri   
   17 Sep 13 08:26:28   
   
   XPost: can.politics, ab.politics, edm.general   
   From: not4utono@   
      
   Barry Bruyea wrote:   
   > On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 06:58:52 -0600, "PV"    
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >> Barry Bruyea wrote:   
   >>> On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 15:35:40 -0600, "PV"    
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> The Doctor wrote:   
   >>>>> In article ,   
   >>>>> PV  wrote:   
   >>>>>> The Doctor wrote:   
   >>>>>>> In article ,   
   >>>>>>> PV  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> In article ,   
   >>>>>>>>> PV  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> In article <0C8Zt.47393$HC3.19683@fx25.iad>,   
   >>>>>>>>>>    
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> You can charge PV with counselling rape with you being the   
   >>>>>>>>>>> target.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Please post a direct link to where I counselled anyone to   
   >>>>>>>>>> commit rape   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Serious libel requires serious proof   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> People who expose their life on the Internet should never   
   >>>>>>>>>> throw stones   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> What was about you saying I wanted to get into KAren's Pants.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> She can have you charged with counselling rape and then make   
   >>>>>>>>> you wear egg on your face.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Want to read that again and try and understand your own   
   >>>>>>>> statement?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Let's try again:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Your kissing KKKaren's ass by agreeing her childish abuse of my   
   >>>>>>>> name clearly showed you were trying to impress her and we all   
   >>>>>>>> know why a 40+ virgin tries to impress a girl and that is to   
   >>>>>>>> get into her pants.  Get into her pants is a slang way of   
   >>>>>>>> saying you wish to have consensual sex with her (damn you are   
   >>>>>>>> stupid).   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Now please point out where I told you to get into her pants,   
   >>>>>>>> told you to rape her or to force yourself upon her   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Not to mention you have failed to post a direct link to the   
   >>>>>>>> above.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> So before you make a total fool of yourself (again) run home to   
   >>>>>>>> mom.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> You might want to recant if Karen shows up with a legal notice.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Here is a hint Doc   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> There never was any kind of suggestion for you to rape anyone,   
   >>>>>> you may have wished it to be true but it's not.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> If you continue to drag KKKaren's name into this without her   
   >>>>>> consent you are setting yourself up for stalking charges, and   
   >>>>>> those could be proved.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> KKKaren is probably staying away because she is becoming   
   >>>>>> embarrassed to be connected with you and your fantasies.  With   
   >>>>>> good reason to.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> So let it go Doc, nothing good will come of this.....especially   
   >>>>>> for you.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Patience is a virtue.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Ignorance is bliss   
   >>>>   
   >>>> However ignorance is not an excuse in the eyes of the law   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Then why do suspects generally get a free ride (or, at least a hell   
   >>> of a deal) if they are not cautioned/read their rights by police?   
   >>   
   >> Ahhh a different topic, that is a case of the police not following   
   >> court established due process when arresting a suspect   
   >   
   > Only different because you and way to many others choose it to be   
   > 'different'.  If ignorance is no excuse, then why does the law say   
   > your 'ignorance' has to be corrected?  It's like the Canada Evidence   
   > Act which says you do not have to give evidence against yourself, but   
   > try and refuse to 'blow' in a Hwy traffic stop, which will get you a   
   > charge of refusing to blow which will carry a penalty virtually   
   > equivalent to blowing over the limit.   
   >>   
      
   Don't know, don't care, answered your question best I can, moving on now   
      
      
      
   --   
   PV   
      
   "The intention of the contents of that link was to make you __find__ the   
   log file and then __read__ its contents, not just cut'n'paste it into a   
   message so that someone else reads it for you."   
      
   Ing. Pierangelo Masarati   
   (response to The Doctor's support request)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca