XPost: can.politics, ab.politics, edm.general   
   From: doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca   
      
   In article ,   
   Barry Bruyea   wrote:   
   >On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 06:58:52 -0600, "PV"    
   >wrote:   
   >   
   >>Barry Bruyea wrote:   
   >>> On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 15:35:40 -0600, "PV"    
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> The Doctor wrote:   
   >>>>> In article ,   
   >>>>> PV  wrote:   
   >>>>>> The Doctor wrote:   
   >>>>>>> In article ,   
   >>>>>>> PV  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> In article ,   
   >>>>>>>>> PV  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> In article <0C8Zt.47393$HC3.19683@fx25.iad>,   
   >>>>>>>>>>    
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> You can charge PV with counselling rape with you being the   
   >>>>>>>>>>> target.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Please post a direct link to where I counselled anyone to   
   >>>>>>>>>> commit rape   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Serious libel requires serious proof   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> People who expose their life on the Internet should never throw   
   >>>>>>>>>> stones   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> What was about you saying I wanted to get into KAren's Pants.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> She can have you charged with counselling rape and then make you   
   >>>>>>>>> wear egg on your face.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Want to read that again and try and understand your own   
   >>>>>>>> statement?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Let's try again:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Your kissing KKKaren's ass by agreeing her childish abuse of my   
   >>>>>>>> name clearly showed you were trying to impress her and we all   
   >>>>>>>> know why a 40+ virgin tries to impress a girl and that is to get   
   >>>>>>>> into her pants.  Get into her pants is a slang way of saying you   
   >>>>>>>> wish to have consensual sex with her (damn you are stupid).   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Now please point out where I told you to get into her pants, told   
   >>>>>>>> you to rape her or to force yourself upon her   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Not to mention you have failed to post a direct link to the   
   >>>>>>>> above.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> So before you make a total fool of yourself (again) run home to   
   >>>>>>>> mom.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> You might want to recant if Karen shows up with a legal notice.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Here is a hint Doc   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> There never was any kind of suggestion for you to rape anyone, you   
   >>>>>> may have wished it to be true but it's not.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> If you continue to drag KKKaren's name into this without her   
   >>>>>> consent you are setting yourself up for stalking charges, and   
   >>>>>> those could be proved.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> KKKaren is probably staying away because she is becoming   
   >>>>>> embarrassed to be connected with you and your fantasies.  With   
   >>>>>> good reason to.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> So let it go Doc, nothing good will come of this.....especially for   
   >>>>>> you.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Patience is a virtue.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Ignorance is bliss   
   >>>>   
   >>>> However ignorance is not an excuse in the eyes of the law   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Then why do suspects generally get a free ride (or, at least a hell of   
   >>> a deal) if they are not cautioned/read their rights by police?   
   >>   
   >>Ahhh a different topic, that is a case of the police not following court   
   >>established due process when arresting a suspect   
   >   
   >Only different because you and way to many others choose it to be   
   >'different'.  If ignorance is no excuse, then why does the law say   
   >your 'ignorance' has to be corrected?  It's like the Canada Evidence   
   >Act which says you do not have to give evidence against yourself, but   
   >try and refuse to 'blow' in a Hwy traffic stop, which will get you a   
   >charge of refusing to blow which will carry a penalty virtually   
   >equivalent to blowing over the limit.   
      
   Case and point Peter Goldring MP Edmonton East.   
      
   >>   
   >>However try going to court and state you didn't realize the speed limit was   
   >>only 50 when you are nailed doing 70.   
   >>   
   >>The judge will reply that ignorance is not an excuse in the eyes of the law.   
   >>   
   >>However the Doctor continues to prove his belief that ignorance is a way of   
   >>life.   
   >   
      
      
   --   
   Member - Liberal International	This is doctor@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@nl2k.ab.ca   
   God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!   
   http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k  Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism   
   The world will happily agree whenever a church labels the Scriptures   
   wrong.-anon   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)