XPost: can.politics, ab.politics, edm.general   
   From: doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca   
      
   In article ,   
   Barry Bruyea   wrote:   
   >On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 08:26:28 -0600, "PV"    
   >wrote:   
   >   
   >>Barry Bruyea wrote:   
   >>> On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 06:58:52 -0600, "PV"    
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> Barry Bruyea wrote:   
   >>>>> On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 15:35:40 -0600, "PV"    
   >>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> The Doctor wrote:   
   >>>>>>> In article ,   
   >>>>>>> PV  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> In article ,   
   >>>>>>>>> PV  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> In article ,   
   >>>>>>>>>>> PV  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <0C8Zt.47393$HC3.19683@fx25.iad>,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>    
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> You can charge PV with counselling rape with you being the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> target.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Please post a direct link to where I counselled anyone to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> commit rape   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Serious libel requires serious proof   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> People who expose their life on the Internet should never   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> throw stones   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> What was about you saying I wanted to get into KAren's Pants.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> She can have you charged with counselling rape and then make   
   >>>>>>>>>>> you wear egg on your face.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Want to read that again and try and understand your own   
   >>>>>>>>>> statement?   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Let's try again:   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Your kissing KKKaren's ass by agreeing her childish abuse of my   
   >>>>>>>>>> name clearly showed you were trying to impress her and we all   
   >>>>>>>>>> know why a 40+ virgin tries to impress a girl and that is to   
   >>>>>>>>>> get into her pants.  Get into her pants is a slang way of   
   >>>>>>>>>> saying you wish to have consensual sex with her (damn you are   
   >>>>>>>>>> stupid).   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Now please point out where I told you to get into her pants,   
   >>>>>>>>>> told you to rape her or to force yourself upon her   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Not to mention you have failed to post a direct link to the   
   >>>>>>>>>> above.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> So before you make a total fool of yourself (again) run home to   
   >>>>>>>>>> mom.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> You might want to recant if Karen shows up with a legal notice.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Here is a hint Doc   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> There never was any kind of suggestion for you to rape anyone,   
   >>>>>>>> you may have wished it to be true but it's not.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> If you continue to drag KKKaren's name into this without her   
   >>>>>>>> consent you are setting yourself up for stalking charges, and   
   >>>>>>>> those could be proved.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> KKKaren is probably staying away because she is becoming   
   >>>>>>>> embarrassed to be connected with you and your fantasies.  With   
   >>>>>>>> good reason to.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> So let it go Doc, nothing good will come of this.....especially   
   >>>>>>>> for you.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Patience is a virtue.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Ignorance is bliss   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> However ignorance is not an excuse in the eyes of the law   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Then why do suspects generally get a free ride (or, at least a hell   
   >>>>> of a deal) if they are not cautioned/read their rights by police?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Ahhh a different topic, that is a case of the police not following   
   >>>> court established due process when arresting a suspect   
   >>>   
   >>> Only different because you and way to many others choose it to be   
   >>> 'different'.  If ignorance is no excuse, then why does the law say   
   >>> your 'ignorance' has to be corrected?  It's like the Canada Evidence   
   >>> Act which says you do not have to give evidence against yourself, but   
   >>> try and refuse to 'blow' in a Hwy traffic stop, which will get you a   
   >>> charge of refusing to blow which will carry a penalty virtually   
   >>> equivalent to blowing over the limit.   
   >>>>   
   >>   
   >>Don't know, don't care, answered your question best I can, moving on now   
   >   
   >   
   >Good.   
   >   
      
   That is PV in a nut shell.   
   --   
   Member - Liberal International	This is doctor@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@nl2k.ab.ca   
   God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!   
   http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k  Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism   
   The world will happily agree whenever a church labels the Scriptures   
   wrong.-anon   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)