Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    calgary.general    |    A very nice Canuck city, no libtard BS    |    176,774 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 175,072 of 176,774    |
|    =?UTF-8?B?Q29uyYDGpkNvbsmA?= to Alan Baker    |
|    Re: Your fracking is f**cking up your la    |
|    04 Feb 14 11:51:12    |
      XPost: bc.politics, edm.general, can.politics       XPost: ab.politics       From: ConsRCons@govt.cda              On 2/4/2014 11:39 AM, Alan Baker wrote:       > If I owned 1000 vehicles, how would that negatively impact the       > environment, Karen? I can only drive one at a time?       >       > As it happens, I have three vehicles:       >       > my daily driver (a Miata that gets about 30mpg)       >       > a Dodge Ram pickup truck that I use very occasionally to tow...       >       > ...my race car, a 1989 Van Diemen with a 1.6 litre engine.       >       > But I'm only ever driving one of them at any one time.       >       > :-)                     I'd say that you're filling up three vehicles instead of just one. Do       you consider that more than if you had only one vehicle that ran on       something other than an oil derivative fuel?              If you had a big home with a huge yard and lawn, and your neighbour had       a small home with a small lawn or no lawn, and you both watered your       lawns in summer - which of you would be using the greatest amount of a       natural resource?              Your "three vehicles" are the big home, ya stupid person.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca