Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    calgary.general    |    A very nice Canuck city, no libtard BS    |    176,774 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 175,123 of 176,774    |
|    Alan Baggett to All    |
|    Income Tax Act Doesn't Require a Logbook    |
|    20 Mar 14 04:38:45    |
      From: canada.revenue.agency@hotmail.com              Income Tax Act Doesn't Require a Logbook :CRA SOTW               By Jim Maroney - Maple Ridge News              If you love your car, you can rest assured that the Canada Revenue Agency       loves your car, too.               In fact, if a CRA auditor pays you a visit it's a virtual certainty that an       interest will be expressed in your vehicle and, more specifically, the logbook       you are expected to maintain.              Interestingly enough, the Income Tax Act doesn't actually specify the       necessary documentary evidence required to record the usage of a vehicle.       Indeed, no mention is made of a logbook at all.               In a perfect world, CRA expects all taxpayers to keep a detailed logbook       documenting every kilometre they've ever driven for business or employment       purposes. In the real world, that rarely happens.              In tacit admission of this fact, late last month, CRA updated its       administrative position regarding documenting the use of a vehicle. This       update first appeared in the 2008 federal budget with a 2009 implementation       date, so this administrative change is        a bit late but certainly better than nothing.               The CRA still touts the benefits of a full logbook for each year, however, the       update states that "the CRA would be prepared to afford considerable weight to       a logbook maintained for a sample period as evidence of a full year's usage of       a vehicle if it        meets the following criteria:              * the taxpayer has previously filled out and retained a logbook covering a       full 12-month period that was typical for the business, as a "base year" (the       12-month period is not required to be a calendar year);        * a logbook for a sample period of at least one continuous three-month period       in each subsequent year has been maintained (the sample year period).;       * the distances travelled and the business use of the vehicle during the       three-month sample period is within 10 percentage points of the corresponding       figures for the same three-month period in the base year;       * the calculated annual business use of the vehicle in a subsequent year does       not go up or down by more than 10 percentage points in comparison to the base       year.              Expecting all taxpayers to be mathematicians, CRA provides a formula designed       to calculate the business use of a vehicle in any year subsequent to the base       year. The calculation takes the ratio of the sample period to the "base year       period" and        multiplies this amount by the base year.               Fortunately, an example is provided to make some sense of it all, at least       that's the intent.       An individual has completed a logbook for a full 12-month period, which showed       a business use percentage in each quarter of 52/46/39/67 and an annual       business use of the vehicle as 49 per cent. In a subsequent year, a logbook       was maintained for a three-       month sample period during April, May and June, which showed the business use       as 51 per cent. In the base year, the percentage of business use of the       vehicle for the months April, May and June was 46 per cent. The business use       of the vehicle would be        calculated as follows:       (51% ÷ 46%) × 49% = 54%              In this case, the CRA would accept 54 per cent business use of the vehicle "in       the absence of contradictory evidence." In other words, all of the taxpayer's       other support had better fit. This 54 per cent business use also falls within       the required 10 per        cent of the 49 per cent "base year" (i.e., it's not lower than 39 per cent or       higher than 59 per cent) satisfying the third criteria described above.              Finally, the CRA sees fit to remind taxpayers that even though records and       supporting documents are only required to be kept for a period of six years       from the end of the tax year to which they relate, the "base year" logbook       must be kept for six years        following the last year for which it is last used to establish business use.              So does this change really simplify the logbook requirement? Yes, to some       degree, but taxpayers will still be expected to maintain a logbook for at       least three months in any given year.               I don't anticipate this administrative change to cause any rush to compliance       as far as vehicle logbooks are concerned.               Jim Maroney is a chartered accountant with Meyers Norris Penny in Maple Ridge.                     -----------------------------------------------------------       Miss a Tax Tale Miss a lot!       Visit the CRA SOTW Library at http://canada.revenue.agency.angelfire.com        ------------------------------------------------------------       Alan Baggett - http://www.taxcollectorsbible.com/ - Tax Collector's Bible              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca